Proof. My interpretation of this statement is that
is the number of
, such that
(if
is not one to one, we may obtain a different value).
Let
. Then
. If
, note
the polynomial
(here, we represent the class of
in
by
). We can write without inconvenient
.
Let
, where
is the group of invertible elements of
.
Then
is a bijection.
Indeed
is well defined : if
, so
.
is injective :
with
implies
.
is surjective : if
verifies
, let
the unique representative of
such that
. Then
, so
.
Thus
Suppose
. Let
is well defined :
.
is injective : if
, then
, so
. As
so
.
is surjective : if
, there exist
, such that
. From the Chinese Remainder Theorem, there exists
, such that
. Then
.
Finally,
, if
:
is a multiplicative function.
The interval
is the disjoint reunion of the
intervals
for
, so
, where
.
As
, the application
is well defined and is bijective, so
. Thus
:
If
, then
□