Exercise 3.13

Use Ex. 3.12 to give another proof of Fermat’s theorem, a p − 1 ≡ 1 ( mod p ) if p does not divide a .

Answers

Proof. If we make the induction hypothesis

P ( k ) ⟺ ∀ ⁡ ( a 1 , a 2 , … , a k ) ∈ ℤ k , ( a 1 + a 2 + ⋯ + a k ) p ≡ a 1 p + a 2 p + ⋯ + a k p ( mod p )

(which is true for k = 1 , k = 2 ) then, from induction hypothesis and the case k = 2 already proved in Ex 3.12,

( a 1 + a 2 + ⋯ + a k + a k + 1 ) p = ( ( a 1 + a 2 + ⋯ + a k ) + a k + 1 ) p ≡ ( a 1 + a 2 + ⋯ + a k ) p + a k + 1 p ( mod p ) ≡ a 1 p + a 2 p + ⋯ + a k p + a k + 1 p ( mod p )

so P ( k ) ⇒ P ( k + 1 ) . We can conclude

∀ ⁡ k ∈ ℕ ∗ , ∀ ⁡ ( a 1 , a 2 , … , a k ) ∈ ℤ k , ( a 1 + a 2 + ⋯ + a k ) p ≡ a 1 p + a 2 p + ⋯ + a k p ( mod p ) .

If we apply this result to the particular case a 1 = a 2 = ⋯ = a k = 1 , we obtain

∀ ⁡ k ∈ ℕ ∗ , k p ≡ k ( mod p ) .

Moreover ( − k ) p ≡ − k p ≡ − k ( mod p ) (even if p = 2 ), and 0 p = 0 , so

∀ ⁡ k ∈ ℤ , k p ≡ k ( mod p ) .

If p ∤ a , a ∈ ℤ , then p ∧ a = 1 , and p ∣ a p − a = a ( a p − 1 − 1 ) , so p ∣ a p − 1 − 1 , a p − 1 ≡ 1 ( mod p ) : this is another proof of Fermat’s theorem. □

User profile picture
2022-07-19 00:00
Comments