Exercise 4.25

Prove Propositions 4.2.2 and 4.2.4.

Answers

Proposition 4.2.2. Suppose that a is odd, e ≥ 3 , and consider the congruence x n ≡ a ( mod 2 e ) . If n is odd, a solution always exists and it is unique.

If n is even, a solution exists iff a ≡ 1 ( mod 4 ) , a 2 e − 2 ∕ d ≡ 1 ( mod 2 e ) , where d = ( n , 2 e − 2 ) . When a solution exists there are exactly 2 d solutions.

Proof. We suppose that a is odd and e ≥ 3 .

From Theorem 2’, we know that { ( − 1 ) a 5 b | 0 ≤ a ≤ 1 , 0 ≤ b ≤ 2 e − 2 } constitutes a reduced residue system modulo 2 e , so we can write

a ≡ ( − 1 ) s 5 t ( mod 2 e ) , 0 ≤ s ≤ 1 , 0 ≤ t ≤ 2 e − 2 , x ≡ ( − 1 ) y 5 z ( mod 2 e ) , 0 ≤ y ≤ 1 , 0 ≤ z ≤ 2 e − 2 .

For all x ∈ ℤ ,

x n ≡ a ( mod 2 e ) ⟺ ( − 1 ) ny 5 nz ≡ ( − 1 ) s 5 t ( mod 2 e )

Then ( − 1 ) ny ≡ ( − 1 ) s ( mod 4 ) , ny ≡ s ( mod 2 ) , ( − 1 ) ny = ( − 1 ) s , thus 5 nz ≡ 5 t ( mod 2 e ) .

Conversely, if ny ≡ s ( mod 2 ) and 5 nz ≡ 5 t ( mod 2 e ) , then x n ≡ a ( mod 2 e ) , so

x n ≡ a ( mod 2 e ) ⟺ { ny ≡ s ( mod 2 ) 5 nz ≡ 5 t ( mod 2 e ) ⟺ { ny ≡ s ( mod 2 ) nz ≡ t ( mod 2 e − 2 )

since the order of 5 modulo 2 e is 2 e − 2 .

∙ Suppose that n is an odd integer. Then

{ ny ≡ s ( mod 2 ) nz ≡ t ( mod 2 e − 2 ) ⟺ { y ≡ s ( mod 2 ) z ≡ n ′ t ( mod 2 e − 2 )

where n ′ is an inverse of n modulo 2 e − 2 : n n ′ ≡ 1 ( mod 2 e − 2 ) .

So x n ≡ a ( mod 2 e ) has an unique solution modulo 2 e .

∙ Suppose that n is an even integer.

Then { ny ≡ s ( mod 2 ) nz ≡ t ( mod 2 e − 2 ) implies s ≡ 0 ( mod 2 ) and d = n ∧ 2 e − 2 ∣ t .

Then a ≡ ( − 1 ) s 5 t ≡ 5 t ( mod 2 e ) , so a ≡ 1 ( mod 4 ) .

Hence a 2 e − 2 d ≡ ( 5 2 e − 2 ) t d ≡ 1 ( mod 2 e ) , since 5 has order 2 e − 2 , and d ∣ t .

So, if n is even, and, with d = n ∧ 2 e − 2 ,

∃ ⁡ x ∈ ℤ , x n ≡ a ( mod 2 e ) ⇒ { a ≡ 1 ( mod 4 ) , a 2 e − 2 d ≡ 1 ( mod 2 e ) .

Conversely, suppose that { a ≡ 1 ( mod 4 ) , a 2 e − 2 d ≡ 1 ( mod 2 e ) .

Then a ≡ ( − 1 ) s 5 t ( mod 2 e ) implies a ≡ ( − 1 ) s ( mod 4 ) , so s is even, and a ≡ 5 t ( mod 2 e ) .

Therefore 5 t 2 e − 2 d ≡ 1 ( mod 2 e ) , which implies 2 e − 2 ∣ t 2 e − 2 d , so d ∣ t .

∃ ⁡ x ∈ ℤ , x n ≡ a ( mod 2 e ) ⟺ ∃ ⁡ y ∈ ℤ , ∃ ⁡ z ∈ ℤ , { ny ≡ s ( mod 2 ) nz ≡ t ( mod 2 e − 2 ) ⟺ ∃ ⁡ z ∈ ℤ , nz ≡ t ( mod 2 e − 2 ) ( since n , s even ) ⟺ ∃ ⁡ z ∈ ℤ , 2 e − 2 ∣ nz − t ⟺ ∃ ⁡ z ∈ ℤ , 2 e − 2 d ∣ n d z − t d ⟺ ∃ ⁡ z ∈ ℤ , ∃ ⁡ q ∈ ℤ , q 2 e − 2 d + z n d = t d

As 2 e − 2 d ∧ n d = 1 , there exists a solution ( q , z 0 ) of this last equation, where 0 ≤ z 0 < 2 e − 2 d , and so x 0 = 5 z 0 is a particular solution of x n ≡ a ( mod 2 e ) , therefore

∃ ⁡ x ∈ ℤ , x n ≡ a ( mod 2 e ) ⟺ { a ≡ 1 ( mod 4 ) a 2 e − 2 d ≡ 1 ( mod 2 e )

If there exists a particular solution x 0 ≡ ( − 1 ) y 0 5 z 0 , then

x n ≡ a ( mod 2 e ) ⟺ x n ≡ x 0 n ( mod 2 e ) ⟺ { ny ≡ n y 0 ( mod 2 ) nz ≡ n z 0 ( mod 2 e − 2 ) ⟺ n ( z − z 0 ) ≡ 0 ( mod 2 e − 2 ) ( since n even ) ⟺ 2 e − 2 d ∣ n d ( z − z 0 ) ⟺ 2 e − 2 d ∣ z − z 0 , ( since 2 e − 2 d ∧ n d = 1 ) ⟺ ∃ ⁡ k ∈ ℤ , z = z 0 + k 2 e − 2 d

As the order of 5 modulo 2 e is 2 e − 2 , the solutions of x n ≡ a ( mod 2 e ) are

x k = ( − 1 ) y 5 z 0 + k 2 e − 2 d , 0 ≤ y < 2 , 0 ≤ k < d ,

so there are exactly 2 d solutions modulo 2 e . □

Proposition 4.2.4. Let 2 l be the highest power of 2 dividing n . Suppose that a is odd and that x n ≡ a ( mod 2 2 l + 1 ) is solvable. Then x n ≡ a ( mod 2 e ) is solvable for all e ≥ 2 l + 1 (and consequently for all e ≥ 1 ). Moreover, all these congruences have the same number of solutions.

Proof. We suppose that a is odd, and that x n ≡ a ( mod 2 2 l + 1 ) is solvable. l is such that n = 2 l n ′ , where n ′ is an odd integer.

Let the induction hypothesis be, for a fixed integer m ≥ 2 l + 1 ,

∃ ⁡ x 0 ∈ ℤ , x 0 n ≡ a ( mod 2 m ) .

Let x 1 = x 0 + b 2 m − l . We show that for an appropriate choice of b ∈ { 0 , 1 } , x 1 n ≡ a ( mod 2 m + 1 ) .

x 1 n = x 0 n + nb 2 m − l x 0 n − 1 + 2 2 m − 2 l A , A ∈ ℤ .

Since m ≥ 2 l + 1 , 2 m − 2 l ≥ m + 1 , so

x 1 n ≡ x 0 n + nb 2 m − l x 0 n − 1 ( mod 2 m + 1 ) .

x 1 n ≡ a ( mod 2 m + 1 ) ⟺ ( x 0 n − a ) + n ′ b x 0 n − 1 2 m ≡ 0 ( mod 2 m + 1 ) ⟺ x 0 n − a 2 m + n ′ b x 0 n − 1 ≡ 0 ( mod 2 )

As a is odd, and x 0 n ≡ a ( mod 2 m ) , m ≥ 1 , x 0 is odd, and n ′ is odd, so there exists an unique b ∈ { 0 , 1 } such that x 0 n − a 2 m + n ′ b x 0 n − 1 ≡ 0 ( mod 2 ) . Hence there exists x 1 ∈ ℤ such that x 1 n ≡ a ( mod 2 m + 1 ) , and the induction is done. Therefore, x n ≡ a ( mod 2 e ) is solvable for all e ≥ 2 l + 1 , and consequently for all e ≥ 1 .

From the Proposition 4.2.2., with the hypothesis e ≥ 3 , we know that the number of solutions of the solvable equation x n ≡ a ( mod 2 e ) , e ≥ 2 l + 1 , is 1 if n is odd, 2 ( n ∧ 2 e − 2 ) if n is even.

If n is even, l ≥ 1 , e ≥ 2 l + 1 ≥ 3 . Since e ≥ 2 l + 1 , and n = 2 l n ′ for an odd n ′ , l ≤ e − 1 2 ≤ e − 2 , so n ∧ 2 e − 2 = n ′ 2 l ∧ 2 e − 2 = 2 l , and the number of solutions is 2 l + 1 , independent of e ≥ 2 l + 1 .

Conclusion: Under the hypothesis x n ≡ a ( mod 2 2 l + 1 ) , where l = ord 2 ( n ) , then x n ≡ a ( mod 2 e ) is solvable for all e ≥ 1 , and all these congruences have the same number of solutions for e ≥ 2 l + 1 , e ≥ 3 . □

Chapter 5

User profile picture
2022-07-19 00:00
Comments