Homepage › Solution manuals › Kenneth Ireland › A Classical Introduction to Modern Number Theory › Exercise 5.36
Exercise 5.36
Show that part (c) of Proposition 5.2.2 is true if is negative and is positive (both still odd).
Answers
As said by Adam Michalik, the Jacobi symbol only defined for positive , so the question, which concerns makes no sense.
To give sense to this question, we must substitute the Kronecker symbol to the Jacobi symbol. The Kronecker symbol (not defined in Ireland-Rosen) is the usual extension of Jacobi symbol (see for instance [Henri Cohen] A course in computational algebraic number theory, [Henri Cohen] Number theory (vol. 1), or [Harvey Cohn] Advanced number theory).
We define Kronecker (or Kronecker-Jacobi) symbol for any and in in the following way.
- (1)
- If , then if , and otherwise.
- (2)
-
For
, write
, where the
are not necessarily distinct primes (including
), or
to take care of the sign. Then we set
where is the Legendre symbol defined above for , and where we define
and also
Proof. Suppose that , both odd. Let , where the are not necessarily distinct primes. Then
Therefore, by Prop. 5.2.2, as are odd and positive,
So the law of quadratic reciprocity remains valid for the Kronecker symbol when is negative ( , both odd). □