Exercise 6.15

Show that

| ∑ t = n m ( t p ) | < p log ⁡ p .

The inequality holds for the sum over any range.

Answers

Lemma. If 0 ≤ x ≤ π 2 , sin ⁡ x ≥ 2 π x .

Proof. As − sin ⁡ is a convex function on [ 0 , π ∕ 2 ] , the graph of sin ⁡ is above any chord, and the chord between the points ( 0 , 0 ) and ( π ∕ 2 , 1 ) has equation y = ( 2 ∕ π ) x , we conclude that sin ⁡ x ≥ 2 π x for 0 ≤ x ≤ π ∕ 2 . □

Proof. Let S = ∑ ⁡ t = n m ( t p ) g with n ≤ m . Then | S | = p | ∑ ⁡ t = n m ( t p ) | . As ( t ∕ p ) g = g t ,

S = ∑ t = m n g t = ∑ t = m n ∑ s = 0 p − 1 ( s p ) ζ ts = ∑ s = 0 p − 1 ( s p ) ζ ms ∑ t = m n ζ ( t − m ) s = ∑ s = 0 p − 1 ( s p ) ζ ms ∑ u = 0 n − m ζ us ( u = t − m ) = ∑ s = 1 p − 1 ( s p ) ζ ms ζ ( n − m + 1 ) s − 1 ζ s − 1

(since for s = 0 , the sum ∑ ⁡ u = 0 n − m ζ us = n − m + 1 and ( s p ) = 0 ). So

S = ∑ s = 1 p − 1 ( s p ) ζ ( n + 1 ) s − ζ ms ζ s − 1 = ∑ s = 1 p − 1 ( s p ) ζ n + m + 1 2 s ζ s 2 ζ n − m + 1 2 s − ζ − n + m − 1 2 s ζ s 2 − ζ − s 2 = ∑ s = 1 p − 1 ( s p ) ζ n + m 2 s sin ⁡ ( ( n − m + 1 ) s π p ) sin ⁡ ( s π p )

As sin ⁡ ( x ) ≥ 2 π x for x ∈ [ 0 , π 2 ] , for all s , 1 ≤ s < p 2 , 0 ≤ sπ p ≤ π 2 , so

| sin ⁡ ( ( n − m + 1 ) s π p ) sin ⁡ ( s π p ) | ≤ 1 2 π ( s π p ) = p 2 s ( s = 1 , 2 , … , ( p − 1 ) ∕ 2 ) .

Since ( s p ) ζ ts depends only of the class of s , we can replace in the preceding calculation the values s = 1 , 2 , … , p − 1 by s = − ( p − 1 ) ∕ 2 , … , − 1 , 1 , … , ( p − 1 ) ∕ 2 , so

S = ∑ s = 1 ( p − 1 ) ∕ 2 ( s p ) ζ n + m 2 s sin ⁡ ( ( n − m + 1 ) s π p ) sin ⁡ ( s π p ) + ∑ s = − ( p − 1 ) ∕ 2 − 1 ( s p ) ζ n + m 2 s sin ⁡ ( ( n − m + 1 ) s π p ) sin ⁡ ( s π p ) .

As sin ⁡ is an odd function,

S = ∑ s = 1 ( p − 1 ) ∕ 2 ( s p ) ζ n + m 2 s sin ⁡ ( ( n − m + 1 ) s π p ) sin ⁡ ( s π p ) + ∑ s = 1 ( p − 1 ) ∕ 2 ( − s p ) ζ − n + m 2 s sin ⁡ ( ( n − m + 1 ) s π p ) sin ⁡ ( s π p ) .

Thus

| S | ≤ 2 ∑ s = 1 ( p − 1 ) ∕ 2 p 2 s = p ∑ s = 1 ( p − 1 ) ∕ 2 1 s .

As S = ∑ ⁡ t = n m ( t p ) g and | g | = p ,

| ∑ t = n m ( t p ) | ≤ p ∑ s = 1 ( p − 1 ) ∕ 2 1 s .

It remains to do a sufficient estimation of the harmonic sum. We prove by induction that for all n ≥ 1 ,

1 + 1 2 + ⋯ + 1 n ≤ log ⁡ ( 2 n + 1 ) .

As 1 ≤ log ⁡ ( 3 ) , this proposition is true for n = 1 . Suppose that is it true for n − 1 :

1 + 1 2 + ⋯ + 1 n − 1 ≤ log ⁡ ( 2 n − 1 ) .

Then

1 + 1 2 + ⋯ + 1 n ≤ 1 n + log ⁡ ( 2 n − 1 ) .

If we prove that 1 n + log ⁡ ( 2 n − 1 ) ≤ log ⁡ ( 2 n + 1 ) , the induction is done.

Let u ( x ) = log ⁡ ( 2 x + 1 ) − log ⁡ ( 2 x − 1 ) − 1 x , x > 1 2 .

u ′ ( x ) = 2 2 x + 1 − 2 2 x − 1 + 1 x 2 = − 4 4 x 2 − 1 + 1 x 2 = − 1 ( 4 x 2 − 1 ) x 2 < 0

As u ( x ) = log ⁡ ( 2 x + 1 2 x − 1 ) − 1 x , lim ⁡ x → + ∞ u ( x ) = 0 . Moreover u is a decreasing function, so for all x > 1 ∕ 2 , u ( x ) > 0 , and for all n ∈ ℕ , n ≥ 1 ,

1 n + log ⁡ ( 2 n − 1 ) ≤ log ⁡ ( 2 n + 1 ) .

We have proved by induction that for all n ≥ 1 ,

1 + 1 2 + ⋯ + 1 n ≤ log ⁡ ( 2 n + 1 ) .

If n = ( p − 1 ) ∕ 2 , where p is an odd prime ( p ≥ 3 ),

∑ s = 1 ( p − 1 ) ∕ 2 1 s ≤ log ⁡ p .

Conclusion:

| ∑ t = n m ( t p ) | < p log ⁡ p .

□

User profile picture
2022-07-19 00:00
Comments