Homepage › Solution manuals › Kenneth Ireland › A Classical Introduction to Modern Number Theory › Exercise 6.23
Exercise 6.23
If , , and is prime such that for , and , show that is irreducible over (Eisenstein’s irreducibility criterion).
Answers
Lemma. If is not irreducible in , then there exist such that .
Proof. (lemma) Suppose that , is not irreducible in .
Then , with , and . As in Ex. 6.5, we can write where , and are primitive. Let : write . Then is primitive (Ex. 6.4), and .
As , , with , so for all . The polynomial being primitive, , so .
Let .Then , , and is the product of two non constant polynomials in . □
Proof. (Ex. 6.23)
Let
where is the class of in . is a ring homomorphism.
We show that is impossible. Indeed in such a situation,
As the only irreducible factor of is , the unicity of the decomposition of a polynomial in irreducible factors in gives
As and , this implies that , , so . Therefore , so , which is in contradiction with the hypothesis.
From the lemma we deduce that is irreducible in . □