Exercise 6.23

If f ( x ) = x n + a 1 x n − 1 + … + a n , a i ∈ ℤ , and p is prime such that p ∣ a i for i = 1 , … , n , and p 2 ∤ a n , show that f ( x ) is irreducible over ℚ (Eisenstein’s irreducibility criterion).

Answers

Lemma. If f ∈ ℤ [ x ] , deg ⁡ ( f ) ≥ 1 , is not irreducible in ℚ [ x ] , then there exist g , h ∈ ℤ [ x ] , deg ⁡ ( g ) ≥ 1 , deg ⁡ ( h ) ≥ 1 such that f = gh .

Proof. (lemma) Suppose that f ( x ) = ∑ ⁡ k = 0 n a k x k , a k ∈ ℤ , is not irreducible in ℚ [ x ] .

Then f ( x ) = f 1 ( x ) f 2 ( x ) , with f 1 , f 2 ∈ ℚ [ X ] , and deg ⁡ ( f 1 ) ≥ 1 , deg ⁡ ( f 2 ) ≥ 1 . As in Ex. 6.5, we can write f 1 ( x ) = λp ( x ) , f 2 ( x ) = μq ( x ) where λ , μ ∈ ℚ , and p , q ∈ ℤ [ X ] are primitive. Let ν = λμ ∈ ℚ : write ν = u ∕ v , u ∧ v = 1 , v ≥ 1 . Then r ( x ) = p ( x ) q ( x ) = ∑ ⁡ k = 0 n c k x k is primitive (Ex. 6.4), and f ( x ) = u v r ( x ) = u v p ( x ) q ( x ) .

As vf ( x ) = ur ( x ) , v ∣ u c i , i = 0 , 1 , … , n , with u ∧ v = 1 , so u ∣ c i for all i . The polynomial r being primitive, v ∣ 1 , so v = 𝜀 = ± 1 .

Let g ( x ) = 𝜀up ( x ) , h ( x ) = q ( x ) .Then g , h ∈ ℤ [ x ] , deg ⁡ ( g ) ≥ 1 , deg ⁡ ( h ) ≥ 1 , and f = gh is the product of two non constant polynomials in ℤ [ x ] . □

Proof. (Ex. 6.23)

Let

φ : { ℤ [ x ] → 𝔽 p [ x ] p ( x ) = a 0 + ⋯ + a n x n ↦ p ¯ ( x ) = a 0 ¯ + ⋯ + a n ¯ x n ,

where a i ¯ is the class of a i in 𝔽 p . φ is a ring homomorphism.

We show that f ( x ) = g ( x ) h ( x ) , g , h ∈ ℤ [ x ] , deg ⁡ ( g ) ≥ 1 , deg ⁡ ( h ) ≥ 1 is impossible. Indeed in such a situation,

f ¯ ( x ) = x n = g ¯ ( x ) h ¯ ( x ) .

As the only irreducible factor of x n is x , the unicity of the decomposition of a polynomial in irreducible factors in 𝔽 p [ x ] gives

g ¯ ( x ) = λ x i , h ¯ ( x ) = μ x j , λ , μ ∈ 𝔽 p , i , j ∈ ℕ .

As deg ⁡ ( g ¯ ) ≤ deg ⁡ ( g ) , deg ⁡ ( h ¯ ) ≤ deg ⁡ ( h ) and deg ⁡ ( g ¯ ) + deg ⁡ ( h ¯ ) = n = deg ⁡ ( f ) + deg ⁡ ( g ) , this implies that i = deg ⁡ ( f ¯ ) = deg ⁡ ( f ) , j = deg ⁡ ( g ¯ ) = deg ⁡ ( g ) , so i ≥ 1 , j ≥ 1 . Therefore p ∣ g ( 0 ) , p ∣ h ( 0 ) , so p 2 ∣ a n = g ( 0 ) h ( 0 ) , which is in contradiction with the hypothesis.

From the lemma we deduce that f ( x ) is irreducible in ℚ [ x ] . □

User profile picture
2022-07-19 00:00
Comments