Homepage › Solution manuals › Michael Artin › Algebra › Exercise 1.3
Exercise 1.3
Let denote the smallest subring of containing the rational numbers and the elements and . Let . Is ? Is
Answers
First, we show that is contained in . Note that
So . Similarly,
So . Conversely, note that , and so we conclude that .
We claim that . To see this, note that and , and so both and are field extensions of . The basis for the vector space over is and the basis for the vector space over is . Assuming towards a contradiction, if then there exists scalars such that
This would imply that the set is linearly dependent over , which contradicts the fact that is a basis for over .
Comments
-
$\bullet$ A parenthesis is missing in the first formula. $\bullet$ I don't understand the writing $\mathbb{Z}(\gamma)$ or $\mathbb{Z}(\alpha,\beta)$, which appears nowhere in Michael Artin. You say that they are fields, but the smallest field which contain $\mathbb{Z}$ and $\gamma$ is $\mathbb{Q}(\gamma) = \mathbb{Q}[\gamma]$, and certainly $\mathbb{Z}[\gamma] \ne \mathbb{Q}[\gamma]$. $\bullet$ Moreover, since $\mathbb{Z}$ is not a field, we cannot speak of "field extension of $\mathbb{Z}$". There is no``vector space over $\mathbb{Z}$". We can speak of the vector space $\mathbb{Q}[\gamma]$ over $\mathbb{Q}$, and $(1,\gamma,\gamma^2,\gamma^3)$ is a basis of this vector space. Or we can speak of the $\mathbb{Z}$-module $\mathbb{Z}[\gamma]$ over $\mathbb{Z}$. Then $(1,\gamma,\gamma^2,\gamma^3)$ is a $\mathbb{Z}$-basis of this free $\mathbb{Z}$-module. $\bullet$ I don't understand the final contradiction ``This would imply that the set $\{1,\alpha,\beta, \alpha \beta\}$ is linearly dependent over $\mathbb{Z}$''. Here $(1,\alpha,\beta, \alpha \beta)$ and $(1,\gamma,\gamma^2,\gamma^3)$ are two basis with four elements. I don't see any contradiction.richardganaye • 2024-06-24
Proof. Since , being the smallest subring of containing and , we obtain first
Starting from
we obtain the system
This gives
This shows that . Since is the smallest subring of containing and , this gives
so
Reasoning by contradiction, assume that . Then .
But is the subring of whose elements are of the form , where . Therefore
To obtain the minimal polynomial of over , note that
so
Moreover is irreducible over :
sage: L.<x> = QQ[’x’] sage: P = x^4 -10*x^2 + 1 sage: P.is_irreducible() True
(We can give a more theoretical justification by proving .)
Since the leading coefficient of is , the Euclidean division of by gives
This writing of is unique, because is the minimal polynomial of over : if , then is a root of , whose degree is less than the degree of the minimal polynomial of , thus and .
(This shows that is a -basis of the -module .)
The comparison of (2) and (3) gives
The unicity of the decomposition of gives : this is a contradiction. Therefore
□