Exercise 1.3

Let [ α , β ] denote the smallest subring of containing the rational numbers and the elements α = 2 and β = 3 . Let γ = α + β . Is [ α , β ] = [ γ ] ? Is [ α , β ] = [ γ ]

Answers

First, we show that [ α , β ] is contained in [ γ ] . Note that

α = 1 2 ( α + β ) 3 9 ( α + β ) .

So α [ γ ] . Similarly,

β = ( α + β ) 3 3 α 8 ( α + β ) .

So β [ γ ] . Conversely, note that α + β [ α , β ] , and so we conclude that [ α , β ] = [ γ ] .

We claim that [ α , β ] [ γ ] . To see this, note that [ α , β ] = ( α , β ) and [ γ ] = ( γ ) , and so both ( γ ) and ( α , β ) are field extensions of . The basis for the vector space ( γ ) over is { 1 , γ , γ 2 , γ 3 } and the basis for the vector space ( α , β ) over is { 1 , α , β , αβ } . Assuming towards a contradiction, if ( γ ) = ( α , β ) then there exists scalars t 3 , t 2 , t 1 , t 0 such that

t 3 γ 3 + t 2 γ 2 + t 1 γ + t 0 = α t 3 γ 3 + t 2 γ 2 + t 1 γ + t 0 α = 0 .

This would imply that the set { 1 , α , β , αβ } is linearly dependent over , which contradicts the fact that { 1 , α , β , αβ } is a basis for ( α , β ) over .

User profile picture
2023-12-09 15:32
Comments
  • $\bullet$ A parenthesis is missing in the first formula. $\bullet$ I don't understand the writing $\mathbb{Z}(\gamma)$ or $\mathbb{Z}(\alpha,\beta)$, which appears nowhere in Michael Artin. You say that they are fields, but the smallest field which contain $\mathbb{Z}$ and $\gamma$ is $\mathbb{Q}(\gamma) = \mathbb{Q}[\gamma]$, and certainly $\mathbb{Z}[\gamma] \ne \mathbb{Q}[\gamma]$. $\bullet$ Moreover, since $\mathbb{Z}$ is not a field, we cannot speak of "field extension of $\mathbb{Z}$". There is no``vector space over $\mathbb{Z}$". We can speak of the vector space $\mathbb{Q}[\gamma]$ over $\mathbb{Q}$, and $(1,\gamma,\gamma^2,\gamma^3)$ is a basis of this vector space. Or we can speak of the $\mathbb{Z}$-module $\mathbb{Z}[\gamma]$ over $\mathbb{Z}$. Then $(1,\gamma,\gamma^2,\gamma^3)$ is a $\mathbb{Z}$-basis of this free $\mathbb{Z}$-module. $\bullet$ I don't understand the final contradiction ``This would imply that the set $\{1,\alpha,\beta, \alpha \beta\}$ is linearly dependent over $\mathbb{Z}$''. Here $(1,\alpha,\beta, \alpha \beta)$ and $(1,\gamma,\gamma^2,\gamma^3)$ are two basis with four elements. I don't see any contradiction.
    richardganaye2024-06-24

Proof. Since γ = α + β [ α , β ] , [ γ ] being the smallest subring of containing and γ , we obtain first

[ γ ] [ α , β ] .

Starting from

γ 3 = ( 2 + 3 ) 3 = 2 2 + 3 3 + 6 3 + 9 2 = 11 2 + 9 3 ,

we obtain the system

γ = 2 + 3 , γ 3 = 11 2 + 9 3 .

This gives

α = 2 = 1 2 ( γ 3 9 γ ) , (1) β = 3 = 1 2 ( 11 γ γ 3 ) . (2)

This shows that α [ γ ] , β [ γ ] . Since [ α , β ] is the smallest subring of containing and α , β , this gives

[ α , β ] [ γ ] ,

so

[ α , β ] = [ γ ] .

Reasoning by contradiction, assume that [ α , β ] = [ γ ] . Then α [ γ ] .

But [ γ ] is the subring of whose elements are of the form P ( γ ) , where P [ x ] . Therefore

α = P ( γ ) , P [ x ] .

To obtain the minimal polynomial of γ over , note that

γ 2 = 3 , γ 2 2 2 γ + 2 = 3 , γ 2 1 = 2 2 γ , ( γ 2 1 ) 2 = 8 γ 2 ,

so

γ 4 10 γ 2 + 1 = 0 .

Moreover Q ( x ) = x 4 10 x 2 + 1 is irreducible over :

sage: L.<x> = QQ[’x’]
sage: P = x^4 -10*x^2 + 1
sage: P.is_irreducible()
True

(We can give a more theoretical justification by proving [ ( 2 , 3 ) : ] = 4 .)

Since the leading coefficient of Q is 1 , the Euclidean division of P by Q gives

P ( x ) = Q ( x ) S ( x ) + R ( x ) , R [ x ] , deg ( R ) < 4 .

α = P ( γ ) = R ( γ ) = a γ 3 + b γ 2 + + d ( a , b , c , d ) (3)

This writing of α is unique, because Q ( x ) is the minimal polynomial of γ over : if a γ 3 + b γ 2 + + d = a γ 3 + b γ 2 + c γ + d , then γ is a root of S ( x ) = ( a a ) x 3 + ( b b ) x 2 + ( c c ) x + ( d d ) , whose degree is less than the degree of the minimal polynomial of γ , thus S ( x ) = 0 and a = a , b = b , c = c , d = d .

(This shows that ( 1 , γ , γ 2 , γ 3 ) is a -basis of the -module [ γ ] .)

The comparison of (2) and (3) gives

α = 1 2 γ 3 9 2 γ = a γ 3 + b γ 2 + + d .

The unicity of the decomposition of α gives 1 2 = a : this is a contradiction. Therefore

[ α , β ] [ α + β ] .

User profile picture
2024-06-24 16:37
Comments