Exercise 3.2

Let 𝔞 be an ideal of a ring A , and let S = 1 + 𝔞 . Show that S 1 𝔞 is contained in the Jacobson radical of S 1 A .

Use this result and Nakayama’s lemma to give a proof of ( 2.5 ) which does not depend on determinants.

Answers

Proof of first claim. Suppose x S 1 𝔞 ; recall that for x S 1 A it suffices to show 1 xy is a unit in S 1 A for all y S 1 A by Prop.  1.9 . Then, x = m ( 1 + a ) for m , a 𝔞 . Let y = n ( 1 + a ) for a 𝔞 , n A , then

1 xy = 1 m 1 + a n 1 + a = 1 mn 1 + a ′′ = 1 + a ′′ mn 1 + a ′′ = 1 + a ′′′ 1 + a ′′ ,

for some a ′′ , a ′′′ 𝔞 , since S is multiplicative and a ′′ mn 𝔞 . Thus, we see that ( 1 + a ′′ ) ( 1 + a ′′′ ) S 1 A is the inverse of 1 xy , and so x S 1 A . □

Corollary 1 (Cor.  2.5 ). Let M be a finitely generated A -module and let 𝔞 be an ideal of A such that 𝔞M = M . Then there exists x 1 ( mod 𝔞 ) such that xM = 0 .

Proof of Corollary. Since M = 𝔞M , we first have that, for any m M , m = a m 𝔞M for some m M . Then, we have S 1 M = ( S 1 𝔞 ) ( S 1 M ) , by having m s = ( a 1 ) ( m s ) as above. Since S 1 𝔞 S 1 A by the first part of the problem, we apply Nakayama to get that S 1 M = 0 . By Exercise 3.1, we see that there is then x S 1 such that xM = 0 , and x 1 ( mod 𝔞 ) by definition of S . □

User profile picture
2023-07-24 15:43
Comments