Exercise 3.5

Let A be a ring. Suppose that, for each prime ideal 𝔭 , the local ring A 𝔭 has no nilpotent element 0 . Show that A has no nilpotent element 0 . If each A 𝔭 is an integral domain, is A necessarily an integral domain?

Answers

Proof. Suppose A has a nilpotent element, i.e., 𝔑 0 . Then, by AM Corollary 3.12 , the nilradical of A 𝔭 is 𝔑 𝔭 . But 𝔑 x 0 x 1 𝔑 𝔭 , which is a contradiction.

Now consider A = k × k ; clearly this is not an integral domain, for ( a , 0 ) ( 0 , b ) = 0 . Note 𝔭 = k × 0 and 𝔮 = 0 × k are the only non-trivial prime ideals of A . Now consider 𝔭 𝔭 ; for any a b 𝔭 𝔭 , we claim a b 0 1 = 0 . For, a ( 0 , 1 ) = 0 and ( 0 , 1 ) A 𝔭 and by definition of the equivalence relation. But recall from AM Example 1 from p.  38 that this ideal 0 is maximal in A 𝔭 , and so A 𝔭 is a field. Since the same argument applies for A 𝔮 , we see that each A 𝔭 being an integral domain does not imply A is an integral domain.

One another simple example would be A = 6 = 2 × 3 . Prime ideals of A are copies of ( 2 ) and ( 3 ) (i.e. 𝔭 1 = { 0 , 3 } and 𝔭 2 = { 0 , 2 , 4 } ) ,and A 𝔭 = ( 3 ) or ( 2 ) . Hence, A 𝔭 is a domain for all of its prime ideals 𝔭 , but A itself is obviously not a domain as 2 3 = 0 .

In general Let R be a ring with two nonzero prime ideals 𝔭 and 𝔮 such that each is not included in the other, and that Spec R = { 𝔭 , 𝔮 } . Now let A = R 𝔭𝔮 . Then A is not a domain because the image of any two element p 𝔭 𝔮 and q 𝔮 𝔭 are zero divisors of A . However, A 𝔭 and A 𝔮 are domains. □

User profile picture
2023-07-24 15:45
Comments