Exercise 3.F.6

Answers

Proof. _(a)_ Suppose v1,,vm spans V . Let φ,ψ V , such that Γ(φ) = Γ(ψ). We need to prove that φ = ψ. By definition of Γ, we have

(φ(v1),,φ(vm)) = (ψ(v1),,ψ(vm))

Hence φ(vj) = ψ(vj) for j = 1,,m. By 2.31, it follows that v1,,vm contains a basis and then, by the uniqueness part in 3.5, φ and ψ are equal. Thus Γ is injective.

Conversely, suppose Γ is injective. Let U = span (v1, ,vm) and suppose by contradiction that UV . By _Exercise 4_, there is a _non-zero_ linear functional φ in V such that φ(u) = 0 for every u U. We have Γ(φ) = 0, hence φ null Γ. But null Γ =0 (since Γ is injective), we get a contradiction.

_(b)_ Suppose v1,,vm is linearly independent. We can extend it to a basis v1,,vm,u1,,un of V . Let x = (x1,,xm) be any vector in 𝔽. Define φ V by

φ(vj) = xj, for j = 1,,m φ(uj) = 0, for j = 1,,n

By 3.5 φ is a well defined linear map. And we have

Γ(φ) = (φ(v1),,φ(vm)) = (x1,,xm) = x

Since x was arbitrary, it follows that Γ is surjective.

Conversely, suppose Γ is surjective. Let U = span (v1, ,vm). We need to prove that dim U = m. We have

dim U + dim U0 = dim V = dim V = dim null Γ + dim range Γ = dim null Γ + m

Where the first equation follows from 3.106, the second from 3.95, the third from the Fundamental Theorem of Linear Maps and the fourth because Γ is surjective.

Now it suffices to show that dim U0 = dim null Γ.

Suppose φ U0. Clearly φ null Γ, thus U0 null Γ. To show the inclusion in the other direction, suppose φ null Γ. Let u U. There are scalars a1,,am such that u = a1v1 + + amvm. Thus,

φ(u) = φ(u = a1v1 + + amvm) = a1φ(v1) + + amφ(vm) = 0

Since u was arbitrary, we have φ U0. Hence null Γ U0. Therefore U0 = null Γ and dim U0 = dim null Γ as desired. □

User profile picture
2017-10-06 00:00
Comments