Homepage › Solution manuals › Stephen Abbott › Understanding Analysis › Exercise 1.2.13
Exercise 1.2.13
For this exercise, assume Exercise ?? has been successfully completed.
- (a)
-
Show how induction can be used to conclude that
for any finite
- (b)
-
It is tempting to appeal to induction to conclude
but induction does not apply here. Induction is used to prove that a particular statement holds for every value of , but this does not imply the validity of the infinite case. To illustrate this point, find an example of a collection of sets where is true for every , but fails.
- (c)
- Nevertheless, the infinite version of De Morgan’s Law stated in (b) is a valid statement. Provide a proof that does not use induction.
Answers
- (a)
- 1.2.5 Is our base case, Assume . We want to show the case. Using associativity we have
- (b)
- (c)
-
First suppose
, then
meaning
for some
, which is the same as
for some
, meaning
. This shows
Now suppose meaning for some , which is the same as implying . This shows inclusion the other way and completes the proof.