Homepage › Solution manuals › Stephen Abbott › Understanding Analysis › Exercise 1.3.10
Exercise 1.3.10
[Cut Property]
The Cut Property of the real numbers is the following:
If and are nonempty, disjoint sets with and for all and , then there exists such that whenever and whenever .
- (a)
- Use the Axiom of Completeness to prove the Cut Property.
- (b)
- Show that the implication goes the other way; that is, assume possesses the Cut Property and let be a nonempty set that is bounded above. Prove exists.
- (c)
- The punchline of parts (a) and (b) is that the Cut Property could be used in place of the Axiom of Completeness as the fundamental axiom that distinguishes the real numbers from the rational numbers. To drive this point home, give a concrete example showing that the Cut Property is not a valid statement when is replaced by .
Answers
- (a)
- If then is obvious. So we must only prove . If then consider . and therefore ; similarly and therefore , implying . If then we can find such that by subtracting and using the least upper/lower bound facts, similarly to Lemma 1.3.8. Thus must equal since we have shown both alternatives are impossible.
- (b)
-
Let
and let
. Clearly
so the cut property applies. We have
and must show the two conditions for
- (i)
- Since , implies thus is an upper bound.
- (ii)
- implies is the smallest upper bound.
Note: Using (a) here would be wrong, it assumes the axiom of completeness so we would be making a circular argument.
- (c)
-
,
does not satisfy the cut property in
since
.
(Alternatively, can be used to avoid needing to single out negative numbers in defining , but requires a proof that is irrational - left to the reader.)