Homepage › Solution manuals › Stephen Abbott › Understanding Analysis › Exercise 1.4.2
Exercise 1.4.2
Let be nonempty and bounded above, and let have the property that for all is an upper bound for and is not an upper bound for . Show .
Answers
This is basically a rephrasing of Lemma 1.3.8 using the archimedean property. The most straightforward approach is to argue by contradiction:
- (i)
- If then there exists an such that contradicting being the least upper bound.
- (ii)
- If then there exists an such that where is not an upper bound, contradicting being an upper bound.
Thus is the only remaining possibility.