Exercise 2.5.1

Give an example of each of the following, or argue that such a request is impossible.

(a)
A sequence that has a subsequence that is bounded but contains no subsequence that converges.
(b)
A sequence that does not contain 0 or 1 as a term but contains subsequences converging to each of these values.
(c)
A sequence that contains subsequences converging to every point in the infinite set { 1 , 1 2 , 1 3 , 1 4 , 1 5 , } .
(d)
A sequence that contains subsequences converging to every point in the infinite set { 1 , 1 2 , 1 3 , 1 4 , 1 5 , } , and no subsequences converging to points outside of this set.

Answers

(a)
Impossible, the Bolzano–Weierstrass theorem tells us a convergent subsequence of that subsequence exists, and that sub-sub sequence is also a subsequence of the original sequence.
(b)
( 1 + 1 n ) 1 and ( 1 n ) 0 so ( 1 2 , 1 + 1 2 , 1 3 , 1 + 1 3 , ) has subsequences converging to 0 and 1 .
(c)
Copy the finitely many previous terms before proceeding to a new term ( 1 , 1 2 , 1 , 1 3 , 1 , 1 2 , 1 4 , 1 , 1 2 , 1 3 , )

The sequence contains infinitely many terms in { 1 , 1 2 , 1 3 , } hence subsequences exist converging to each of these values.

(d)
Impossible, the sequence must converge to zero which is not in the set.

Proof: Let 𝜖 > 0 be arbitrary, pick N large enough that 1 n < 𝜖 2 for n > N . We can find a subsequence ( b m ) 1 n meaning | b m 1 n | < 𝜖 2 for some m . using the triangle inequality we get

| b m 0 | | b n 1 n | + | 1 n 0 | < 𝜖 2 + 𝜖 2 = 𝜖

therefore we have found a number b m in the sequence a m with | b m | < 𝜖 . This process can be repeated for any 𝜖 therefore a sequence which converges to zero can be constructed.

User profile picture
2022-01-27 00:00
Comments