Exercise 2.7.10

[Infinite Products] Review Exercise 2.4.10 about infinite products and then answer the following questions:

(a)
Does 2 1 3 2 5 4 9 8 17 16 converge?
(b)
The infinite product 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 certainly converges. (Why?) Does it converge to zero?
(c)
In 1655, John Wallis famously derived the formula ( 2 2 1 3 ) ( 4 4 3 5 ) ( 6 6 5 7 ) ( 8 8 7 9 ) = π 2

Show that the left side of this identity at least converges to something. (A complete proof of this result is taken up in Section 8.3.)

Answers

(a)
Rewriting the terms as a n = ( 1 + 1 n ) and using the result from 2.4.10 implies the product diverges since 1 n diverges.
(b)
Converges by the monotone convergence theorem since the partial products are decreasing and greater then zero. To show that the product converges to zero, the key insight is to rewrite each term a n = ( 2 n 1 ) ( 2 n ) = 1 ( 2 n ( 2 n 1 ) ) = 1 b n , where b n = 2 n ( 2 n 1 ) . Then the partial products
p n = i = 1 n a n = 1 i = 1 n b n

But

i = 1 n b n = i = 1 n ( 1 + 1 2 n 1 )

and since 1 ( 2 n 1 ) diverges by comparison against a multiple of the harmonic series, b n diverges. Thus, to show there exists some N so that n N implies p n < 𝜖 , simply take N large enough so that i = 1 n b n > 1 𝜖 .

(c)
In compontent form we have a n = ( 2 n ) 2 ( 2 n 1 ) ( 2 n + 1 ) = ( 2 n ) 2 ( 2 n ) 2 1 = 1 + ( 2 n ) 2 ( ( 2 n ) 2 1 ) ( 2 n ) 2 1 = 1 + 1 ( 2 n ) 2 1

And since 1 ( ( 2 n ) 2 1 ) converges by a comparison test with 1 n 2 , exercise 2.4.10 implies

n = 1 ( 1 + 1 ( 2 n ) 2 1 )

also converges.

User profile picture
2022-01-27 00:00
Comments