Homepage › Solution manuals › Stephen Abbott › Understanding Analysis › Exercise 2.7.14
Exercise 2.7.14
[Dirichlet’s Test] Dirichlet’s Test for convergence states that if the partial sums of are bounded (but not necessarily convergent), and if is a sequence satisfying with , then the series converges.
- (a)
- Point out how the hypothesis of Dirichlet’s Test differs from that of Abel’s Test in Exercise 2.7.13, but show that essentially the same strategy can be used to provide a proof.
- (b)
- Show how the Alternating Series Test (Theorem 2.7.7) can be derived as a special case of Dirichlet’s Test.
Answers
- (a)
-
Abel’s test gets it’s convergence from
converging, while Dirichlet’s test gets its convergence from
. Expanding on that, the proof that the
term converges is the same in Abel and Dirichlet, but the proof that
differs depending on if we get our convergence from
and
bounded, or
and
bounded.
The proof is almost identical to Abel’s test, bound and use the triangle inequality on the right hand side to get (note because decreasing)
Thus is bounded and increasing, so it converges by MCT. To see the term converges, simply note that and .
Thus the original series converges, and furthermore
Because .
- (b)
- Let with and . The series is bounded, so Dirichlet’s test implies converges.