Exercise 2.7.14

[Dirichlet’s Test] Dirichlet’s Test for convergence states that if the partial sums of k = 1 x k are bounded (but not necessarily convergent), and if ( y k ) is a sequence satisfying y 1 y 2 y 3 0 with lim y k = 0 , then the series k = 1 x k y k converges.

(a)
Point out how the hypothesis of Dirichlet’s Test differs from that of Abel’s Test in Exercise 2.7.13, but show that essentially the same strategy can be used to provide a proof.
(b)
Show how the Alternating Series Test (Theorem 2.7.7) can be derived as a special case of Dirichlet’s Test.

Answers

(a)
Abel’s test gets it’s convergence from x n converging, while Dirichlet’s test gets its convergence from ( y n ) 0 . Expanding on that, the proof that the k = 1 n s k ( y k y k 1 ) term converges is the same in Abel and Dirichlet, but the proof that s n y n + 1 differs depending on if we get our convergence from ( y n ) 0 and ( s n ) bounded, or ( s n ) s and ( y n ) bounded.

The proof is almost identical to Abel’s test, bound | s n | < M and use the triangle inequality on the right hand side to get (note y k y k + 1 > 0 because decreasing)

k = 1 n | s k | ( y k y k + 1 ) M k = 1 n ( y k y k + 1 ) = M ( y 1 y n + 1 ) M y 1

Thus s k ( y k y k + 1 ) is bounded and increasing, so it converges by MCT. To see the s n y n + 1 term converges, simply note that ( y n ) 0 and | s n | < M .

Thus the original series converges, and furthermore

k = 1 x k y k = k = 1 s k ( y k y k + 1 )

Because ( s n y n + 1 ) 0 .

(b)
Let a n 0 with a 1 a 2 0 and lim a n = 0 . The series ( 1 ) n is bounded, so Dirichlet’s test implies ( 1 ) n a n converges.
User profile picture
2022-01-27 00:00
Comments