Exercise 2.8.4

(a)
Let 𝜖 > 0 be arbitrary and argue that there exists an N 1 ∈ N such that m , n ≥ N 1 implies B − 𝜖 2 < t mn ≤ B .
(b)
Now, show that there exists an N such that
| s mn − S | < 𝜖

for all m , n ≥ N .

Answers

(a)
t mn ≤ B follows from the fact that B is an upper bound on { t mn : m , n ∈ N } . Lemma 1.3.8 indicates that there exists some p , q such that t pq > B − 𝜖 ∕ 2 , and since p 1 ≤ p 2  and  q 1 ≤ q 2 ⟹ t p 1 q 1 ≤ t p 2 q 2 , we can choose N 1 = max ⁡ { p , q } .
(b)
By the triangle inequality, | s mn − S | ≤ | s mn − s nn | + | s nn − S | . Letting n ′ = min ⁡ { n , m } and m ′ = max ⁡ { n , m } ,
| s mn − s nn | = | ∑ i = n ′ m ′ ∑ j = 1 n a ij | ≤ ∑ i = n ′ m ′ ∑ j = 1 n | a ij | = | t mn − t nn | ≤ 𝜖 2

from Exercise 2.8.4a), as long as m , n ≥ N 1 . Since S = lim ⁡ n → ∞ s nn there exists N 2 such that for n ≥ N 2 , | s nn − S | < 𝜖 ∕ 2 ; thus picking N = max ⁡ { N 1 , N 2 } ensures

| s mn − S | < 𝜖

for all m , n ≥ N .

User profile picture
2022-01-27 00:00
Comments