Exercise 2.8.4

(a)
Let 𝜖 > 0 be arbitrary and argue that there exists an N 1 N such that m , n N 1 implies B 𝜖 2 < t mn B .
(b)
Now, show that there exists an N such that
| s mn S | < 𝜖

for all m , n N .

Answers

(a)
t mn B follows from the fact that B is an upper bound on { t mn : m , n N } . Lemma 1.3.8 indicates that there exists some p , q such that t pq > B 𝜖 2 , and since p 1 p 2  and  q 1 q 2 t p 1 q 1 t p 2 q 2 , we can choose N 1 = max { p , q } .
(b)
By the triangle inequality, | s mn S | | s mn s nn | + | s nn S | . Letting n = min { n , m } and m = max { n , m } ,
| s mn s nn | = | i = n m j = 1 n a ij | i = n m j = 1 n | a ij | = | t mn t nn | 𝜖 2

from Exercise 2.8.4a), as long as m , n N 1 . Since S = lim n s nn there exists N 2 such that for n N 2 , | s nn S | < 𝜖 2 ; thus picking N = max { N 1 , N 2 } ensures

| s mn S | < 𝜖

for all m , n N .

User profile picture
2022-01-27 00:00
Comments