Exercise 4.2.9

[Infinite Limits] The statement lim ⁡ x → 0 1 ∕ x 2 = ∞ certainly makes intuitive sense. To construct a rigorous definition in the challenge response style of Definition 4.2 . 1 for an infinite limit statement of this form, we replace the (arbitrarily small) 𝜖 > 0 challenge with an (arbitrarily large) M > 0 challenge:

Definition: lim ⁡ x → c f ( x ) = ∞ means that for all M > 0 we can find a δ > 0 such that whenever 0 < | x − c | < δ , it follows that f ( x ) > M .

(a)
Show lim ⁡ x → 0 1 ∕ x 2 = ∞ in the sense described in the previous definition.
(b)
Now, construct a definition for the statement lim ⁡ x → ∞ f ( x ) = L . Show lim ⁡ x → ∞ 1 ∕ x = 0 .

Answers

(a)
For a given M > 0 , if 0 < | x − 0 | = | x | < 1 ∕ M = δ then 1 ∕ | x | 2 = 1 ∕ x 2 < M as desired.
(b)
lim ⁡ x → ∞ f ( x ) = L means that for all 𝜖 > 0 we can find a N such that when x > N it follows that | f ( x ) − L | < 𝜖 . For a given 𝜖 > 0 , choosing N = 1 ∕ 𝜖 leaves us with x > N ⟹ 1 ∕ N = 𝜖 > 1 ∕ x hence lim ⁡ x → ∞ 1 ∕ x = 0 .
User profile picture
2022-01-27 00:00
Comments