Exercise 5.4.6

(a)
Modify the previous argument to show that g ( 1 ) does not exist. Show that g ( 1 2 ) does not exist.
(b)
Show that g ( x ) does not exist for any rational number of the form x = p 2 k where p Z and k N { 0 } .

Answers

(a)
Let x m = 1 + 1 2 m with m 0 . Then h 0 ( x m ) = 1 1 2 m , h n ( x m ) = 1 2 m for 1 n m , and h n ( x m ) = 0 for n > m . g ( 1 ) = 1 , so
g ( x m ) g ( 1 ) x m 1 = 1 1 2 m + m 2 m 1 1 2 m = m 1

and for the same reason as in Exercise 5.4.5, g ( 1 ) does not exist.

h 0 ( x ) is differentiable at 1 2 , so we can instead consider whether ( g h 0 ) ( x ) is differentiable at 1 2 . But since h n ( x ) = 2 h n + 1 ( x 2 ) , g ( x ) = 2 ( g h 0 ) ( x 2 ) . Since g ( 1 ) does not exist, both g h 0 and g are not differentiable at 1 2 .

(b)
Note that h n ( x ) is only non-differentiable at points of the form q 2 n where q Z . Express x in lowest form, so that p is odd, and consider
i ( x ) = g ( x ) n = 0 k 1 h n ( x ) = n = k h k ( x )

which is differentiable at x if and only iff g is as well. Since h a + b ( x ) = h a ( 2 b x ) 2 b ,

i ( x ) = 1 2 k n = 0 h 0 ( 2 k x ) = 1 2 k g ( 2 k x ) = 1 2 k g ( p )

We’ve shown that g is not differentiable at 0 or 1, and since g is periodic it’s easy to show it’s not differentiable at any p Z , completing the proof.

User profile picture
2022-01-27 00:00
Comments