Homepage › Solution manuals › Stephen Abbott › Understanding Analysis › Exercise 5.4.8
Exercise 5.4.8
Review the argument for the nondifferentiability of at nondyadic points. Does the argument still work if we replace with the summation ? Does the argument work for the function ?
Answers
The critical part to showing that is not differentiable at nondyadic points was showing that
does not converge to zero, preventing the limit defining the derivative to exist. For the case , the above term would diverge to infinity, since would decrease by a factor of 3 on each iteration while would only decrease by a factor of 2. For similar reasons, in the case of , the above term would converge to 0, and the argument is no longer valid.