Homepage › Solution manuals › Stephen Abbott › Understanding Analysis › Exercise 6.2.6
Exercise 6.2.6
Assume on a set . Theorem 6.2.6 is an example of a typical type of question which asks whether a trait possessed by each is inherited by the limit function. Provide an example to show that all of the following propositions are false if the convergence is only assumed to be pointwise on . Then go back and decide which are true under the stronger hypothesis of uniform convergence.
- (a)
- If each is uniformly continuous, then is uniformly continuous.
- (b)
- If each is bounded, then is bounded.
- (c)
- If each has a finite number of discontinuities, then has a finite number of discontinuities.
- (d)
- If each has fewer than discontinuities (where is fixed), then has fewer than discontinuities.
- (e)
- If each has at most a countable number of discontinuities, then has at most a countable number of discontinuities.
Answers
- (a)
-
False pointwise when
Now suppose converges to uniformly. We have
By uniform convergence to , we can fix large enough so that the first and last terms are both less than . Then since is uniformly continuous, we can choose so that implies the middle term is less than , and that , implying is uniformly continuous.
- (b)
-
False pointwise when
Now suppose uniformly. We want to show is bounded. Let bound , ie. for all .
Set and apply the Cauchy Criterion to get so implies
Setting and rearranging gives
implying is bounded by when .
Now set large enough that implies which, after rearranging gives
Implying is bounded.
- (c)
-
False for pointwise and uniform convergence. Define
and
The reason uniformly is
Each has exactly point discontinuities, but has countably many. Thus this is a counterexample.
Intuitively adds on finer and finer details of , which is why it converges uniformly. But discontinuities can be as small/detailed as we want without screwing up uniform convergence.
- (d)
-
False pointwise since we can have each
continuous (zero discontinuities) but have
not be continuous (see (a) for an example).
Now suppose uniformly. Let be a discontinuity of , meaning there exists an such that no matter how small is. I’d like to show is a discontinuity of for some , i.e. that there exists an such that no matter how small is.
Pick and set large enough that implies . Applying the three way triangle inequality gives
Letting we see meaning is not continuous at for all .
Now given discontinuities of , applying the above process multiple times shows that eventually will have every discontinuity of , but has at most discontinuities, implying has at most discontinuities.
- (e)
-
False pointwise when (using a modified version of Thomae’s function for
)
Now suppose uniformly. In (d) we showed every discontinuity of is eventually a discontinuity of ; reworded this is saying (where is the set of discontinuities of )
Since each is countable, this implies is countable.