Exercise 6.6.8

Here is a weaker form of Lagrange’s Remainder Theorem whose proof is arguably more illuminating than the one for the stronger result.

(a)
First establish a lemma: If g and h are differentiable on [ 0 , x ] with g ( 0 ) = h ( 0 ) and g ( t ) h ( t ) for all t [ 0 , x ] , then g ( t ) h ( t ) for all t [ 0 , x ] .
(b)
Let f , S N , and E N be as Theorem 6.6.3, and take 0 < x < R . If | f ( N + 1 ) ( t ) | M for all t [ 0 , x ] , show | E N ( x ) | M x N + 1 ( N + 1 ) !

Answers

(a)
Let e ( t ) = h ( t ) g ( t ) . If g ( t ) > h ( t ) for some t [ 0 , x ] then we could apply the Mean Value Theorem on e ( t ) between 0 and t to find c ( 0 , t ) [ 0 , x ] with e ( c ) = h ( t ) g ( t ) < 0 , a contradiction since h ( t ) g ( t ) .
(b)
Since S N ( N + 1 ) = 0 , f ( N + 1 ) ( t ) = E ( N + 1 ) ( t ) . We then have | E N ( N + 1 ) ( t ) | E N ( N + 1 ) M , and by repeated application of the lemma in part (a) we have E N ( x ) M x N + 1 ( N + 1 ) ! . A similar argument holds for E N ( x ) M x N + 1 ( N + 1 ) ! , and we can combine these succiently as
| E N ( x ) | M x N + 1 ( N + 1 ) !
User profile picture
2022-01-27 00:00
Comments