Equivalently, we wish to evaluate
|
|
Note that since
,
. We prove the following lemma: for
,
|
|
To see this, let
be the value in the limit. Note that
and similarly
, and note
|
|
In other words,
grows at least exponentially, and therefore must not be bounded.
We now show that for arbitrary
, we can find
large enough so that for
,
|
Note that, for any
,
|
and for any
,
|
|
Find
so that
, and fix
. From our earlier lemma, we can find
large enough that
ensures
|
|
where we’ll choose
to satisfy
. This ensures that
|
and
|
We can convert this to indicate that for large enough
,
, which together with our earlier observation that
lets us conclude
|
|
On the other hand, plugging in the formulas for
and
in Exercise 8.3.3 (c) into
|
|
leaves us with Wallis’s product. |
|
|
|