Exercise 2.1.1

Answers

1.
Yes. That’s the definition.
2.
No. Consider a map f from over to over by letting f(x + iy) = x. Then we have f(x1 + iy1 + x2 + iy2) = x1 + x2 but f(iy) = 0 = if(y) = iy.
3.
No. This is right when T is a linear trasformation but not right in general. For example, T : xx + 1

It’s one-to-one but that T(x) = 0 means x = 1. For the counterexample of converse statement, consider f(x) = |x|.

4.
Yes. We have T(0V ) = T(0x) = 0T(0V )W = 0W, for arbitrary x V .
5.
No. It is dim(V ). For example, the transformation mapping the real line to {0} will be.
6.
No. We can map a vector to zero.
7.
Yes. This is the Corollory after Theorem 2.6.
8.
No. If x2 = 2x1, then T(x2) must be 2T(x1) = 2y1.
User profile picture
2011-06-27 00:00
Comments