Exercise 6.1.1

Answers

1.
Yes. It’s the definition.
2.
Yes. See the paragraph at the beginning of this chapter.
3.
No. It’s conjugate linear in the second component. For example, in with standard inner product function we have i,i = 1 but not i i,1 = 1.
4.
No. We may define the inner product function f on to be f(u,v) = 2uv.
5.
No. Theorem 6.2 does not assume that the dimension should be finite.
6.
No. We may define the conjugate-transpose of any matrix A to be the conjugate of At.
7.
No. Let x = (1,0), y = (0,1), and z = (0,1). Then we have x,y = x,z = 0.
8.
Yes. This means y = y,y = 0.
User profile picture
2011-06-27 00:00
Comments