Homepage Solution manuals Terence Tao An Introduction to Measure Theory Exercise 1.1.23 (Bounded continuous functions are Riemann integrable)

Exercise 1.1.23 (Bounded continuous functions are Riemann integrable)

Let f : [a,b] be a bounded, piecewise continuous function. Show that f is Riemann integrable.

Answers

We proceed by showing several related results which together constitute for a proof for the above assertion.

Lemma 1. Let I be a closed interval, and let f : I be a continuous function. Then f is Riemann integrable.

Proof. Since f is continuous on a compact interval I = [a,b], it must be uniformly continuous. That is,

𝜖 > 0δ > 0x,y I : |x y| δ|f(x) f(y)| 𝜖

Thus, fix an 𝜖 > 0. We can then find a δ > 0 for 𝜖(b a) for the uniform continuity. By Archimedean principle choose a corresponding 1 n < δ. Set Δ := m(I)n = (b a)n, and consider the partition I1 = [a,a+Δ),,In1 = [a+(n2)Δ,a+(n1)Δ),In = [a+(n1)Δ,a+nΔ]. A key observation is that the supremum and the infimum of each interval Ii do not differ by more than 𝜖. To see why, recall that from uniform continuity on [a,b] follows the uniform continuity on each Ii. In other words, we have f(x) f(y) 𝜖 for all x,y Ii. Taking supremum over x we obtain sup f(Ii) f(y) 𝜖 for all y Ii. Taking infimum over y we get sup f(Ii) inf f(Ii) 𝜖. Define a piecewise continuous functions g¯ = sup f(Ii)1Ii,g̲ = inf f(Ii)1Ii; these are obviously piecewise continuous functions that majorize/minorize f. Then,

p.c[a,b]g¯ p.c[a,b]g̲ = i=1n sup f([a + (i 1)Δ,a + iΔ)) m(I) i=1n inf f([a + (i 1)Δ,a + iΔ)) m(I) = i=1n [sup f([a + (i 1)Δ,a + iΔ)) inf f([a + (i 1)Δ,a + iΔ))] m(I) i=1n 𝜖 b a b a n = 𝜖

Thus, f must be Riemann integrable by Darboux criteria. □

Lemma 2. Let I be an open interval. Let f : I be a bounded continuous function. Then f is Riemann integrable.

Proof. The idea is to partition I = (a,b) into three intervals (a,a + 𝜖),[a + 𝜖,b 𝜖],(b 𝜖,b). We have seen in the previous part that f is Riemann integrable on [a + 𝜖,b 𝜖]. Thus, we only need to demonstrate that f is Riemann integrable on (a,a + 𝜖) and (b 𝜖,b). Fix an 𝜖 > 0. Let M be a bound of f, and consider the intervals (a,a + 𝜖 M) and (b 𝜖 M,b). We then see that the upper and lower cover of f on these intervals not only converge to each other, but vanishes altogether! Set g¯ = sup f(a,a + 𝜖 M),g̲ = inf f(a,a + 𝜖 M). Then

p.c[a,b]g¯ = sup f( (a,a + 𝜖 M )) m( (a,a + 𝜖 M )) M 𝜖 M = 𝜖

p.c[a,b]g¯ = inf f( (a,a + 𝜖 M )) m( (a,a + 𝜖 M )) M 𝜖 M = 𝜖

and similarly with (b 𝜖 M,b). □

Now we have all the machinery to prove the theorem assertion. That is, let I be an interval. Let f : I be a bounded, piecewise continuous function. We demonstrate that f is Riemann integrable.

Let I1,,In be a partition of I with respect to which f is piecewise continuous. If on each of the intervals Ii the function f is Riemann integrable, then f is Riemann integrable on the whole interval I (e.g. taking the combination of piecewise upper and lower functions). Thus, it suffices to show that f is Riemann integrable on some interval Ii, on which it is continuous and bounded. But no matter which boundaries Ii includes, it can be partitioned into purely open and purely closed sets. By Lemma 1 and 2 of this proof, f is Riemann integrable on each of these partitions. Thus, by the same argument f Riemann integrable on the whole Ii, and we are done.

User profile picture
2020-03-30 00:00
Comments