Homepage › Solution manuals › Terence Tao › An Introduction to Measure Theory › Exercise 1.2.4 (Disjoint compact sets are separated)

Exercise 1.2.4 (Disjoint compact sets are separated)

Let E,F ⊂ ℝd be disjoint closed sets, E is compact. Show that d(E,F) > 0, and give an counterexample when E is not compact.

Answers

Suppose, for the sake of contradiction, that d(E,F) = 0. In other words, for each 𝜖 > 0 we can find a pair x ∈ E and y ∈ F such that d(x,y) < 𝜖. By the axiom of countable choice, we can build a sequence (x)n∈ℕ and (y)n∈ℕ such that

∀ ⁡n ∈ ℕ : d(xn,yn) ≤ 1 n

By definition of compactness, every sequence, in particular (xn)n∈ℕ must contain a convergent subsequence (xnk)k∈ℕ → x0. Since E is closed, x0 ∈ E. But, then for each 𝜖 > 0 we can find an k ∈ ℕ large enough so that such that d(x0,xnk) < 1∕nk < 𝜖∕2 whereas we also have d(xnk,ynk) < 𝜖∕2. Thus, by triangle inequality, a sequence of points (ynk)k∈ℕ in F can be eventually 𝜖-close to the adherent point x0 of E, meaning x0 is an adherent point of F. By closedness assumption, x0 ∈ F - thus, we have arrived at the contradiction to the disjointness assumption.

User profile picture
2020-05-30 00:00
Comments