Homepage › Solution manuals › Terence Tao › An Introduction to Measure Theory › Exercise 1.2.5 (Lebesgue and Jordan measures agree on countable unions of almost disjoint boxes)

Exercise 1.2.5 (Lebesgue and Jordan measures agree on countable unions of almost disjoint boxes)

Let E = ⋃ ⁡ n=1∞Bn be a union of almost disjoint boxes B1,B2,…. Then we have

m∗,(J)(E) = m∗(E)

Answers

In the case that E is unbounded, both quantities are infinite. Thus, suppose that E is bounded.

≤ )
We have to demonstrate that (in general, not only for this exercise) we have sup ⁡ { m ( A ) : A  is elementary A ⊆ E } ≤ m ∗ ( E )

Pick an arbitrary elementary inner cover A ⊂ E with the elementary measure m ( A ) = m ∗ ( A ) by Lemma 1.2.6. By monotonicity of the Lebesgue outer measure, we have m ∗ ( A ) ≤ m ∗ ( E ) . Since our choice of A was arbitrary, taking the supremums yields the result.

≥ )
We give ourselves an 𝜖 > 0 of a room to show that sup ⁡ { m ( A ) : A  is elementary A ⊆ E } ≥ ∑ n = 1 ∞ | B n | − 𝜖

Since ∑ ⁡ n = 1 ∞ | B n | − 𝜖 is a series of positive values, we for our 𝜖 > 0 we can find a N ∈ ℕ such that ∑ ⁡ n = 1 ∞ | B n | − ∑ n = 1 N | B n | ≤ 𝜖 . But the finite sum describes the elementary measure of some inner cover of E : we have | B 1 | + … + | B N | = | B 1 ∘ | + … + | B N ∘ | = m ( ⋃ ⁡ n = 1 N B n ) . Thus set A : = ⋃ ⁡ n = 1 N B n is a disjoint union of boxes inside E ; thus A is a elementary inner cover of E . In other words, we have

m ( A ) + 𝜖 ≥ m ∗ ( E )

Taking supremums for A , and letting 𝜖 → 0 we get the desired result.

User profile picture
2020-05-30 00:00
Comments