Homepage › Solution manuals › Terence Tao › An Introduction to Measure Theory › Exercise 1.2.6 (Inner non-regularity of the Lebesgue outer measure)

Exercise 1.2.6 (Inner non-regularity of the Lebesgue outer measure)

Counterexample to the reverse of Lemma 1.2.12.

Answers

We use the usual "entangled" set ℝ∕ℚ. We have already shown that the Lebesgue outer measure of this set is 1. We now demonstrate that

sup ⁡ {m∗(U) : U ⊆ E,U is open} = 0.

Pick an arbitrary open set U ⊆ E. By definition, for any point x ∈ U ⊆ E we can find an open interval (a,b) small enough such that (a,b) ⊆ U. But this is impossible, since any interval around x would necessarily contain some rational number. Thus, any open set contained in E is empty, and thus the sup ⁡ must be equal to zero.

User profile picture
2020-05-30 00:00
Comments

Take E = [0,1]∖ℚ. If U ⊂ E is an open set, then U = ∅, because E does not contain any open intervals. Thus, sup ⁡ U⊂E,U open m∗(U) = 0. However, if E ⊂⋃ ⁡ nIn where (In) n are disjoint intervals, then it must be that [0,1] ⊂⋃ ⁡ nIn. So ∑ ⁡ nm (In) ≥ m([0,1]) = 1. Thus, m∗(E) = 1.

User profile picture
2021-12-04 15:42
Comments