Homepage Solution manuals Terence Tao An Introduction to Measure Theory Exercise 1.2.7 (Equivalent formulations of Lebesgue measurablity)

Exercise 1.2.7 (Equivalent formulations of Lebesgue measurablity)

Let E d. Show that the following are equivalent:

(i)
E is Lebesgue measurable
(ii)
(Outer approximation by open sets) For every 𝜖 > 0 one can contain E in an open set U with m(UE) 𝜖.
(iii)
(Approximation by open sets) For every 𝜖 > 0, one can find an open set such that m(UE) 𝜖.
(iv)
(Inner approximation by closed sets) For every 𝜖 > 0 one can find a closed set F contained in E with m(UE) 𝜖.
(v)
(Almost closed) E differs from a closed set by a set of arbitrarily small Lebesgue outer measure.
(vi)
(Almost measurable) E differs from a Lebesgue measurable set by a set of arbitrarily small Lebesgue outer measure.

Answers

We prove the equivalence by ( i ) ( ii ) ( iii ) and ( i ) ( iv ) ( v ) .

( i ) ( ii ) ( iii )

  • (i) (ii) follows directly from the definition
  • (ii) (iii). Fix 𝜖 and by (ii) find a set U containing E such that m ( U E ) 𝜖 . Since E U we have U E = ( U E ) ( E U ) = U E ; thus, m ( U E ) = m ( U E ) 𝜖 .
  • (iii) (ii). We find an open set U such that m ( U E ) 𝜖 . The trick is to cover the difference between two sets U E by another open set V ; by Lemma 1.2.12 we find an open cover V of E U with 𝜖 m ( V ) 2 𝜖 . Then, E U V (and U V is open) with

    m ( ( U V ) E ) = m ( U E V E ) m ( U E ) + m ( V E ) m ( U E ) + m ( V ) 3 𝜖

( i ) ( iv ) ( v ) ( vi )

  • (i) (iv). Then E is Lebesgue measurable, and by Lemma 1.2.13 its complement E c is Lebesgue measurable too. By definition we can find an open cover U of E c such that m ( U E c ) 𝜖 . Notice that U c ( E c ) c = E ; thus, F : = U c is a closed inner cover of E . Furthermore, we have U E c = U E = E U c ; thus, we obtain

    m ( E U c ) = m ( U E c ) 𝜖

  • (iv) (v). Trivial.
  • (v) (vi). Since every closed set is Lebesgue measurable (Lemma 1.2.13), the assertion follows directly.
  • (vi) (i). Pick an arbitrary 𝜖 > 0 , and take a measurable set E 𝜖 such that m ( E E 𝜖 ) 𝜖 3 as in (vii). On one hand, notice that we can replace the measurable set E 𝜖 by an open set U 1 E 𝜖 such that m ( U 1 ) m ( E 𝜖 ) 𝜖 3 . On the other hand, by Lemma 1.2.12 we can replace E E 𝜖 by an open set U 2 such that m ( U 2 ) m ( E E 𝜖 ) 𝜖 3 . Then we have an open set U : = U 1 U 2 such that E U and

    m ( U E ) m ( U 1 E ) + m ( U 2 E ) = m ( U 1 E ) + 𝜖 3 m ( ( U 1 E 𝜖 E 𝜖 ) E ) + 𝜖 3 m ( U 1 E 𝜖 E ) + m ( E 𝜖 E ) + 𝜖 3 m ( U 1 E 𝜖 ) + m ( E 𝜖 E ) + 𝜖 3 𝜖
User profile picture
2020-05-30 00:00
Comments

(1)(2) is the definition.
(2) (3) follows by taking the same open set U A. (3) (2) : Fix 𝜀 > 0 and let U be such that m(UA) < 𝜀. Let V UA be an open set such that m(V ) < 2𝜀, by outer regularity. Note that A U (AU) U V , which is an open set, and m((U V )A) m(UA) + m(V A) m(UA) + m(V ) < 3𝜀. So (1)(2)(3) (1) (4) : A is Lebesgue measurable, so also Ac is. Fix 𝜀 > 0 and let U be an open set such that m (UAc) < 𝜀. Let F = Uc. So m(FA) = m (UAc) < 𝜀, and F is closed. (4) (5) : Fix 𝜀 > 0 and let F be a closed set such that m(AF) < 𝜀. By outer regularity let U AF be an open set such that m(U) < 2𝜀. Then F Uc is a closed 36 set and F Uc F A A, and

m (AF Uc) m(AF) + m (AUc) m(AF) + m(U) < 3𝜀

(5) (6) : Fix 𝜀 > 0 and let F A be a closed set such that m(AF) < 𝜀. The C = F is Lebesgue measurable, and m(AC) = m(AF) < 𝜀. (6) (3) : Fix 𝜀 > 0 and let C be Lebesgue measurable such that m(AC) < 𝜀. Let U C be an open set such that m(UC) = m(UC) < 𝜀. Note that AU AC CU, so

m(AΔU) m(AΔC) + m(CΔU) < 2𝜖

User profile picture
2021-12-04 17:25
Comments