Homepage Solution manuals Terence Tao An Introduction to Measure Theory Exercise 1.3.18 (Finite and null integrals criteria)

Exercise 1.3.18 (Finite and null integrals criteria)

Let f : d [0,+] be Lebesgue measurable. Show that

(i)
If df < then f is finite almost everywhere. Give a counterexample to the converse statement.
(ii)
df = 0 if and only if f is zero almost everywhere.

Answers

Throughout the proof, we will make use of the infamous measure-theoretic convention "× 0 = 0".

(i)
We argue by contradiction. Suppose that df < and f is infinite on a non-null set E. We then have df df 1E =d 1E = m(E) =

since m(E)0. For the converse statement, consider any constant function f = 1, and we have

df = Simpd1 1d = 1 m(d) = .

(ii)
Suppose that df = 0. By Markov’s inequality (Lemma 1.3.15) and by monotonicity we have for any λ > 0 m ( {x d : f(x)0}) m ( {x d : f(x) λ}) 1 λdf = 0

Conversely, suppose that f is zero almost everywhere. We then have by divisibility property of the Lebesgue integral

df =df 1 {xd:f(x)=0} +df 1 {xd:f(x)0} 0 + sup {f} 0 = 0.

User profile picture
2020-08-30 00:00
Comments