Exercise 1.3.25 (Littlewood-like principles)

(i)
(absolutely integrable functions almost have bounded support)
Let f : d be an absolutely integrable function, and let 𝜖 > 0. Show that there exists a ball B(0,R) outside of which f hs an L1 norm of at most 𝜖 dB(0,R)|f| 𝜖.

(ii)
(measurable functions are almost locally bounded)
Let f : d be a Lebesgue measurable function, and let 𝜖 > 0. Show that there exists a Lebesgue measurable set E d of measure at most 𝜖 outside of which f is locally bounded R > 0M < x B(0,R)E : |f(x)| M.

Answers

Fix an arbitrary 𝜖 > 0.

(i)
By Theorem 1.3.20 (Approximation of absolutely integrable functions) we can find a compactly supported function g with f gL1 𝜖. Since g is compactly supported, we can find an R > 0 large enough so that g(x) = 0 whenever x dB(0,R). With this we obtain 𝜖 d|fg| =B(0,R)|fg|+dB(0,R)|fg| =B(0,R)|fg|+dB(0,R)|f|dB(0,R)|f|.

(ii)
By Exercise 1.3.23 we can find a Lebesgue measurable set A d such that m(A) 𝜖2 and f is continuous on dE. We can enlarge A to an open set U by expending another 𝜖2, i.e., we can find an open set U d such that m(U) m(A) + 𝜖2 𝜖 and f is continuous on dU.

Now pick an arbitrary bounded set B(0,R). Notice that the set B(0,R)U = B(0,R) Uc is both closed and bounded. By Heine-Borel Theorem (cf. Analyis II, Theorem 1.5.7) our set B(0,R)U is compact. Thus, our continuous function f must become uniformly continuous when restricted to B(0,R)U (cf. Analysis II, Theorem 2.3.5). As such, it must be bounded on this set since uniformly continuous functions are bounded.

(for the last assertion: if we argue by contradiction, then we can construct a sequence (xn)n for which fn(xn) > n for n , i.e., (fn(xn)n . But (xn)n has a convergent subsequence, and we have (xni)i x0 yet f(xni) > ni which contradicts to d(xn,xm) δd(f(xn),f(xm)) 𝜖).

User profile picture
2020-07-12 00:00
Comments