Homepage › Solution manuals › Terence Tao › An Introduction to Measure Theory › Exercise 1.4.17 (Borel measurable sets and Cartesian products)
Exercise 1.4.17 (Borel measurable sets and Cartesian products)
Let be a Borel measurable subset of , and let be a Borel measurable subset of . Show that is a Borel measurable subset of .
Answers
We first consider the case when is box.
-
Case I: is Borel measurable, is a box.
Following the Remark 1.4.15, we verify whether the following propertyis a -algebraic property.
- (i)
- (empty set) Let be the empty set in . Then is true, since for any box we have is an empty set in , and thus Borel measurable in by definition.
- (ii)
- (complement) Let be Borel measurable such that holds, i.e., is a box is Borel measurable in . Then must hold also, since . is Borel measurable by hypothesis, and is Borel measurable as a countable union of boxes . The set difference of Borel measurable sets is again Borel measurable.
- (iii)
- (countable unions) Let be a sequence of subsets of such that for all the property holds. We then have , and is Borel measurable by axiom 3.
Now consider for the set of all boxes in , which generates the Borel algebra . The property holds for all of the sets in the generating set by the first part of Exercise 1.1.4. Thus, it holds for any set in , and we are done.
-
Case II: is Borel measurable, is Borel measurable.now look at the property given by
- 1.
- (empty set) Let be the empty set in . Then is true, since is an empty set in , and thus Borel measurable in by definition.
- 2.
- (complement) Let be Borel measurable such that holds, i.e., is Borel measurable is Borel measurable in . Then must hold also, since . is Borel measurable by hypothesis, and is Borel measurable as a countable union of Borel measurable sets (see Case I). The set difference of Borel measurable sets is again Borel measurable.
- 3.
- (countable unions) Let be a sequence of subsets of such that for all the property holds. We then have , and is Borel measurable by axiom 3.
For now consider the elements of the generating set . Again, the property holds for all of the sets in the generating set by the first part of Exercise 1.1.4. Thus, it holds for any set in , and we are done.