Homepage Solution manuals Terence Tao An Introduction to Measure Theory Exercise 1.4.40 (Basic properties of absolutely convergent integral)

Exercise 1.4.40 (Basic properties of absolutely convergent integral)

Let (X,,μ) be a measure space, and let L1 denote the space L1((X,,μ) ) of all measurable functions from (X,) to (,).

(i)
Show that L1 is a vector space over .
(ii)
Show that the integration map : L1 ,fXfdμ

is a linear transformation.

(iii)
Establish the triangle inequality f + gL1 fL1 + gL1

and the homogeneity property, for all f,g L1 and c :

cfL1 = |c|fL1

(iv)
If μ-almost everywhere f = g then Xfdμ =Xgdμ.
(v)
If (X,,μ) is a refinement of (X,,μ) then Xfdμ =Xfdμ

(vi)
fL1 = 0 if and only if μ-almost everywhere f = 0.
(vii)
If Y X is measurable, and f L1 then f Y L1, and Y f Y dμ = f1Y .

Answers

(i)
By Theorem 1.3 from Linear Algebra it suffices to demonstrate that
  • 0f L1. A zero function is a simple function with integral zero, and is thus absolutely integrable.
  • f,g L1f + g L1. If ℜf and ℜg are finite quantities, then by Theorem 1.4.37

    (f + g) = (ℜf + ℜg) = ℜf + ℜg

    is finite as well. Since the same is true for the imaginary part, the assertion follows.

  • c ,f L1cf L1, and by assumption ℜc,ℑc,ℜf,ℑf < . By the linearity of the integration operator (Theorem 1.4.37 and Exercise 1.4.35 (iii)) we then have

    (cf) = [(ℜc + iℑc)(ℜf + iℑf)] = ℜcℜf ℑcℑf = ℜcℜf ℑcℑf <

(ii)
This is a direct concequence of additivity from Theorem 1.4.37 and homogeneity from Exercise 1.4.35.
(iii)
By the pointwise triangle inequality we have |f + g||f| + |g|. Since all of these functions are unsigned, we can use the properties from the Exercise 1.4.35. By the monotonicity property of the integral, we have X|f + g|dμ X|f|dμ +X|g|dμ. The homogeneity property follows from the pointwise identity |cf| = |c||f| and by the homogeneity property of the unsigned integral in general.
(iv)
Suppose that μ-almost everywhere we have f = g. Let E be the null set on which fg.
First, assume that f,g are both real valued. By Exercise 1.4.35 (xi) we split our integrals. Using the analogous property of the unsigned integral from Exercise 1.4.35 (i) we obtain: Xfdμ = f+ f =XEf+dμ +Ef+dμ XEfdμ Efdμ =XEf+dμ XEfdμ =XEg+dμ XEgdμ =XEg+dμ +Eg+dμ XEgdμ Egdμ = g+ g =Xgdμ

Now assume f,g are real valued. We similiarly obtain

Xfdμ = ℜf + iℑf =XEℜfdμ +Eℜfdμ + iXEℑfdμ + iEℑfdμ =XEℜfdμ + iXEℑfdμ =XEℜgdμ + iXEℑgdμ =XEℜgdμ +Eℜgdμ + iXEℑgdμ + iEℑgdμ = ℜg + iℑg =Xgdμ
(v)
It is important to make clear that f is measurable with respect to the original σ-algebra B; in other words, for every open set U the inverse f1(U) is B-measurable, even if we are looking at the space (X,B,μ).A trick is to recall the results of Exercise 1.4.35 part (ix) and (x) which says that for an increasing sequence E1 E2 of measurable functions we have lim nmin (f,n) × 1En =Xfdμ

This allows us to restrict our attention to horizontally and vertically truncated functions; thus, it suffices to demonstrate the theorem for bounded functions with finite measure support S X. We have to demonstrate that

sup {SimpXhdμ : h is simple in B 0 h f } = sup {SimpXgdμ : g is simple in B 0 g f }.

  • Pick an arbitrary B-simple function h minorising f. From B B we see that h is automatically also a B-simple function, and so Simp Xhdμ is contained on the left-hand side.
  • Pick an arbitrary B-simple function g = c11F1 + + cn1Fn minorizing f. Notice that F1 Fn = S. Let E1,,Ek be a partition of S. Define

    ĉ1 = max {cj : 1 j n,E1 Fj} ĉn = max {cj : 1 j n,En Fj}

    and

    h := ĉ11E1 + + ĉn1En

    We then have

    SimpXgdμ = c1μ (F1) + + cnμ (Fn) = c1μ ( i=1nF 1 Ei) + + cnμ ( i=1nF n Ei) = i=1nc 1m (F1 Ei) + + i=1nc nm (Fn Ei) = j=1nc jm (Fj E1) + + j=1nc jm (Fj En) j=1nĉ jm (Fj E1) + + j=1nĉ jm (Fj En) = ĉ1μ ( j=1nF j E1) + + ĉnμ ( j=1nF j En) = ĉ1μ (E1) + + ĉnμ (En) = SimpXhdμ

    and we are done.

(vi)
We first prove (). First, suppose f is real valued. Since Xfdμ = f+ f, and the both unsigned terms are zero by the analogous assertion from Exercise 1.4.35 (viii), we have Xfdμ = 0. In the case when f is complex valued, breaking down the integral into the real and imaginary parts and using the previous sentence yields the result.
Now we demonstrate the converse statement (). First suppose that f is real valued. By non-negativity of the integral, both f+ and f1 must be also zero. By Exercise 1.4.35 (viii) both f+ and f must be zero μ-almost everywhere. Sum of two μ-almost everywhere zero functions is again a μ-almost everywhere zero function, and we are done. The assertion for the complex valued f follows similarly.
(vii)
As in the previous parts of the exercise, we first break down the real valued integral into positive and negative parts, and then apply the analogous statement for unsigned functions from the Exercise 1.4.35. Similarly, the assertion follows for complex-valued integrals.
User profile picture
2020-08-30 00:00
Comments
  • Notations in part (5) make no sense.
    isn2025-05-13