Homepage › Solution manuals › Terence Tao › An Introduction to Measure Theory › Exercise 1.4.44 (Borel-Cantelli lemma)
Exercise 1.4.44 (Borel-Cantelli lemma)
- (i)
- Give an alternative proof of Borel-Cantelli lemma from Exercise 1.4.43 that does not rely on convergence theorems.
- (ii)
- Give a counterexample that shows that the Borel-Cantelli lemma can fail if the condition is relaxed to .
Answers
- (i)
- We look closer at the set
of points in
which are contained in infinitely many
’s:
Since , we can apply monotone convergence Exercise 1.4.23:
where the last step is a necessity for the series to converge.
- (ii)
- As for the counterexample, consider
and the shrinking spreading bump sequence
Then, any point is contained in infinitely many of these sets, yet
Comments
-
$\mu(\{(0, x), x \in \mathcal{R}\}) = 0$Shinkenjoe • 2025-01-21