Homepage Solution manuals Terence Tao An Introduction to Measure Theory Exercise 1.4.46 (Generalised dominated convergence theorem)

Exercise 1.4.46 (Generalised dominated convergence theorem)

Let (X,,μ) be a measure space, and let (fn)n be a sequence of measurable functions from X to that converge pointwise μ-almost everywhere to a measurable limit f : X . Suppose that there is an unsigned absolutely integrable function G,g1,g2, from X to [0,+] such that the fn are pointwise μ-almost everywhere bounded by G + gn, and that gn 0. Show that

lim nfn =Xfdμ.

Answers

Without the loss of generality we make the following assumptions:

  • By modifying fn and f on a null set, we may assume without loss of generality that fn converge to f pointwise everywhere.
  • Similarly, we may assume that |fn| are bounded by G + gn everywhere.
  • Since we can always split the complex integral into the real and the imaginary part, we only look at the case where fn,f are real. The assertion for the complex valued integrals then follows easily by additivity.

Since gn 0 we conclude gn 0.

We now demonstrate both sides of inequality

limsup nfn Xfdμ liminf nfn

  • From |fn| gn + G, i.e., from gn G fn G + gn we see that the function 0 fn + gn + G is non-negative. This allows us to apply Fatou’s lemma (Corollary 1.4.46) and conclude

    (f + G) liminf n (fn + gn + G)

    or, in other words,

    Xfdμ + G liminf nfn + lim ngn + G

    Removing the vanishing integral of gn and subtracting the finite quantity G from both sides we obtain the desired result

    Xfdμ liminf nfn

  • Similarly, from |fn| gn + G, i.e., from gn G fn G + gn we see that the function 0 G + gn fn is non-negative. Applying Fatou’s lemma, we get

    (G f ) liminf n (G + gn f ) limsup n (G + gn f )

    or, in other words,

    G Xfdμ G + lim ngn limsup nfn

    Removing the vanishing integral of gn and subtracting the finite quantity G from both sides and negating the inequality we obtain

    liminf nfn Xfdμ

    as desired.

User profile picture
2020-09-25 00:00
Comments
  • This solution cannot be correct. Integral converging to zero does not implies that the function converges to zero pointwise, nor does it imply a.e. convergence to 0 pointwise. Consider the typewriter function
    BOB2022-12-30