Homepage › Solution manuals › Terence Tao › An Introduction to Measure Theory › Exercise 1.4.4 (Finite Boolean algebra is atomic)
Exercise 1.4.4 (Finite Boolean algebra is atomic)
Let be a set, and let be a Boolean algebra over . Show that if is finite, then it is atomic and has cardinality of for some .
Answers
Since is finite with , we can enumerate its elements as . Define
Sorting out the empty sets, consider
We argue that the elements of this set, enumerated as , are atoms that generate . We verify the atom criteria from Example 1.4.7. First of all, it is obvious that the elements are disjoint.
Also, it is easy to verify that their union gives us the ambient space
Finally, any set of can be represented as a union of some of these atom sets. To see why, pick an arbitrary . Then
We shortly verify this. If then either or . In the former case, is contained in the right-hand side due to . In the former case, there exists such taht and thus . Now pick an arbitrary from the right-hand side. Then such that . But , which is only possible when , and we have .
Comments
Let be a finite Boolean algebra, so we can model as a sequence of its elements .
Define the set . Since , it is also finite. We claim is a partition of .
The elements being disjoint is enforced by the conditions set.
Let be an arbitrary element of . Since is a Boolean algebra, it covers , and there must be an element such that . Define the function as follows:
Then the sequence and is well defined and finite, ending with .
Since we started with an element containing , must also contain . Now assume to the contrary there is an different from such that . Then , and so is . is in either one of them, and then at some point the algorithm would have chosen one of these sets (or one contained in them) over , a contradiction.
Thus, , and covers and thus is a partition. Since it is finite, we can enumerate it and call it with for some .
Now we have to prove that every element of is in .
Consider an arbitrary . Since covers , it also covers in a disjoint manner. Let , and assume to the contrary . As covers , we must have . But then there must exist at least one such that and , a contradiction of being a member of . So , and thus .
Since every , which is closed under union, every , with , is in , and both algebras are equal.