Exercise 1.7.4 (Pre-measure)

(i)
Show that the requirement that μ0 is finitely additive could be relaxed to the condition that μ0() = 0 without affecting the definition of a pre-measure.
(ii)
Show that the condition μ0( n=1En) = n=1μ0(En) could be relaxed to μ0( n=1En) n=1μ0(En) without affecting the definition of a pre-measure.
(iii)
On the other hand, give an example to show that if one performs both of the above two relaxations at once, one starts admitting objects μ0 that are not pre-measures.

Answers

Definition 1.7.7 is as follows:

Definition 1. (Pre-measure) Let B0 be a Boolean algebra. A pre-measure μ0 on B0 is a finitely additive measure

μ0 : B0 [0,+]

with the property that

μ0 ( n=1E n) = n=1μ 0(En)

whenever (En)n are disjoint sets in B such that n=1En is in B0.

We now verify the theorem hypotheses.

(i)
Suppose that μ0() = 0. Then, for any E1,E2 B0 and En = for n > 2 we can recover finite additivity by μ0(EF) = μ0 ( n=1E n) = i=1μ 0(En) = μ0(E1)+μ0(E2)+ i=3μ 0(En) = μ0(E1)+μ0(E2).

(ii)
Notice that finite additivity of a pre-measure automatically automatically implies monotonicity as well: μ0(E F) = μ0(E (FE)) = μ0(E) + μ0(FE) μ0(E) + μ0(F).

By finite additivity and monotonicity, for each N N we have

μ0 ( n=1E n) μ0 ( n=1NE n) = n=1Nμ 0 (En) .

Taking limits as N preserves the inequality

μ0 ( n=1E n) n=1μ 0 (En) .

Combined with the newly assumed countable subadditivity, this gives the desired result.

(iii)
We are looking for a function μ0 : B0 [0,+] such that
(i)
μ0() = 0,
(ii)
μ0 ( n=1En) n=1μ0(En) for any sequence of disjoint sets (Fn)nN in B0, yet
(iii)
μ0 ( n=1Fn) n=1μ0(Fn) for some sequence of disjoint sets (Fn)nN in B0.

Consider the Jordan inner measure m,(J)(E) on a σ-algebra L(R) of all Lebesgue measurable sets of R. Then

  • m,(J)(E) is non-negative as it is a infimum over a set of non-negative elementary measures.
(i)
m,(J)() = 0, obviously.
(ii)
m,(J)(E) is subadditive by the properties of infimum
inf {m(A) : n=1En A A is elementary } n=1inf {m(A) : En A A is elementary }
(iii)
m,(J)(E) is not countably additive, as per Exercise 1.1.18 (4) for q Q [0,1] we have 1 = m,(J)(Q [0,1]) qQm,(J)({q}) = 0.

User profile picture
2021-09-06 00:00
Comments
  • Part (3) isn't a proper counterexample since $\mu_0$ needs to be countably subadditive.
    isn2025-07-23