Homepage › Solution manuals › Terence Tao › An Introduction to Measure Theory › Exercise 1.7.4 (Pre-measure)
Exercise 1.7.4 (Pre-measure)
- (i)
- Show that the requirement that is finitely additive could be relaxed to the condition that without affecting the definition of a pre-measure.
- (ii)
- Show that the condition could be relaxed to without affecting the definition of a pre-measure.
- (iii)
- On the other hand, give an example to show that if one performs both of the above two relaxations at once, one starts admitting objects that are not pre-measures.
Answers
Definition 1.7.7 is as follows:
Definition 1. (Pre-measure) Let be a Boolean algebra. A pre-measure on is a finitely additive measure
with the property that
whenever are disjoint sets in such that is in .
We now verify the theorem hypotheses.
- (i)
- Suppose that .
Then, for any
and
for
we can recover finite additivity by
- (ii)
- Notice that finite additivity of a pre-measure automatically automatically
implies monotonicity as well:
By finite additivity and monotonicity, for each we have
Taking limits as preserves the inequality
Combined with the newly assumed countable subadditivity, this gives the desired result.
- (iii)
- We are looking for a function
such that
- (i)
- ,
- (ii)
- for any sequence of disjoint sets in , yet
- (iii)
- for some sequence of disjoint sets in .
Consider the Jordan inner measure on a -algebra of all Lebesgue measurable sets of . Then
- is non-negative as it is a infimum over a set of non-negative elementary measures.
- (i)
- , obviously.
- (ii)
-
is subadditive by the properties of infimum
- (iii)
- is not countably additive, as per Exercise 1.1.18 (4) for we have
Comments
-
Part (3) isn't a proper counterexample since $\mu_0$ needs to be countably subadditive.isn • 2025-07-23