Homepage › Solution manuals › Terence Tao › Analysis I › Exercise 2.2.4 (Trichotomy of order for natural numbers)
Exercise 2.2.4 (Trichotomy of order for natural numbers)
Justify the three statements marked (why?) in the proof of Proposition 2.2.13.
Answers
Hints. You might want to use Proposition 2.2.12.
Model solution. When we have for all : We want to show that for some . Take . Then by Definition 2.2.1.
If , then : To show , we can instead show by Proposition 2.2.12(e). Since we have , so by Proposition 2.2.12(d) we have .
If , then : Since , we want to show that . By Proposition 2.2.12(e) it suffices to show , but this is true since .
Source: Issa Rice’s blog.
Comments
Here we will show the whole proof of Proposition 2.2.13. The parts that we had to prove will be marked bold.
Proof.
Recall that (see p26).
Our proof will consist of parts.
- 1.
- We show the uniqueness first, i.e, we show that no more than
of the above statements can be true at the same time. Suppose for the sake of
contradiction that two statements can hold at the same time. This results in
three possible cases:
- Case :
and
hold at the same time.
Since by Proposition 2.2.12, we have where is some positive natural number. Since , we have, by the cancellation law, - a contradiction. - Case :
and
hold at the same time.
This follows by the same line of reasoning as in the previous case. - Case :
and
hold at the same time.
Since if is true by Definition 2.2.1, and similarly, if is true by Definition 2.2.1. Therefore, using Proposition 2.2.12 (c), we have This stands in contradiction to the previous cases. Thus, and can not hold at the same time.
- Case :
and
hold at the same time.
- 2.
- Now we show that at least one of the statements is true. We induct on
. Let’s look at the
base case We
have because
by Definition 2.2.1.
If is not positive, we
have by definition;
otherwise, .
Now we suppose inductively that trichotomy law is true for some natural number
We now
prove
which is
"at least one of the statements or or is true."
By the induction hypothesis, one of the following three cases holds.- (a)
- . Then, by Proposition 2.2.12 (f), . In other words, .
- (b)
-
Since
we have
By the reverse version of the cancellation law, the following statement is true:
which is the same as,
Since is positive, by Proposition 2.2.12, we obtain
- (c)
-
By Proposition 2.2.12 (e), we have:
By the definition of the ordering of the natural numbers, we have
If is not positive, we have . If is positive, we have by by Proposition 2.2.12 (f) that Thus either or , and in either case we are done.
Thus, we’ve proven that at least one of the statements or or is true, which closes the induction.