Homepage › Solution manuals › Terence Tao › Analysis I › Exercise 3.1.3 (Commutativity and associativity of set union)
Exercise 3.1.3 (Commutativity and associativity of set union)
Prove the remaining claims in Lemma 3.1.13.
Lemma 3.1.13. If
and
are objects, then
. If
are sets, then the union operation is commutative (i.e.,
) and associative (i.e.,
. Also, we have
Answers
Proof. We complete the proof of Lemma 3.1.13.
- 1.
- (associativity) By definition, to prove associativity, we should prove that if
, then
and vice versa.
Part 1: .
The fact that means that is in either or We now look at these cases.- (a)
- If
is
in
we have two additional cases.
-
Then, by Axiom 3.4, it’s true that:
-
Then, by Axiom 3.4, we have:
-
- (b)
-
Then, by Axiom 3.4, we have:
as desired.
Part 2: .
Follows similarly. - 2.
- (commutativity) Suppose that
holds. By Definition 3.1.4, this means
From the basics of mathematical logic (see Appendix A), we know that or is equivalent to or for any statements . Thus, the above assertion is equivalent to
By Definition 3.1.4, we therefore have . The other direction, i.e, implies , follows symmetrically. In other words, we have proven that
meaning that .
- 3.
- By transitivity of equality (Exercise 3.1.1) and commutativity of
set union (previous part of this exercise), it suffices to show that
and
that .
-
()
-
From the basics of mathematical logic (see Appendix A), we know that the statement OR is equivalent to for any mathematical statement . By Axiom 3.4, we thus get
In other words, by Definition 3.1.4.
-
()
-
By Axiom 3.4,
Since is always false by Axiom 3.3, we can verify using some basics of mathematical logic that
Thus, we have
-