Homepage › Solution manuals › Terence Tao › Analysis I › Exercise 3.1.5 (Equivalent formulations of subset relation)
Exercise 3.1.5 (Equivalent formulations of subset relation)
Let , be sets. Show that the three statements , , are logically equivalent (any one of them implies the other two).
Answers
Proof. To prove that those statements are logically equivalent, we use the following chain of implications (see Appendix A: Basics of mathematical logic):
-
Suppose that . By Exercise 3.1.4, it suffices to show that and hold simultaneously.
-
-
Let be arbitrary. By Axiom 3.4, is an element of or is an element of In the first case, implies that , since by theorem assumption In the other case, as well. Thus, we get
-
-
Let be arbitrary. Then, since by Axiom 3.4,
Thus,
-
-
Suppose that . By Exercise 3.1.4, it suffices to show that and hold simultaneously.
-
-
Let be arbitrary. By Definition 3.1.23, is an element of and is an element of In particular, is an element of . Since our choice of was arbitrary, this follows for all .
-
-
Let be arbitrary. Suppose for the sake of contradiction that . means that is not an element of or is not an element of . cannot be true because this would contradict the original assumption. Therefore, Since we have Since by assumption, we have that every of the set is also contained in by Definition 3.1.4. Thus, . But this is a contradiction, since as we showed above, Thus, and therefore, as desired.
-
- Finally, suppose that Let be arbitrary. We have since by assumption. means that is contained in and is contained in . The fact that is an element of completes the proof.