Homepage › Solution manuals › Terence Tao › Analysis I › Exercise 3.1.6 (Sets form a boolean algebra)
Exercise 3.1.6 (Sets form a boolean algebra)
Prove Proposition 3.1.28.
Proposition 3.1.28 (Sets form a boolean algebra). Let
,
,
be sets, and
let be a set
containing ,
,
as
subsets.
(a) (Minimal element) We have
and .
(b) (Maximal element) We have
and .
(c) (Identity) We have
and .
(d) (Commutativity) We have
and .
(e) (Associativity) We have
and .
(f) (Distributivity) We have
and .
(g) (Partition) We have
and .
(h) (De Morgan laws) We have
and .
Answers
Proof.
- (a)
-
- () This was already proven in Exercise 3.1.3.
- () By Definition 3.1.23, is an element of means that is an element of and is an element of But can not be an element of , and therefore, is false and therefore, equivalent to By Definition 3.1.4 this means that
- (b)
- By the theorem assumption we have By Exercise 3.1.5, this implies that and .
- (c)
- We have
which means that every element of is an element of and vice versa. By Definition 3.1.4, we therefore have
We havewhich means that every element of is an element of and vice versa. By Definition 3.1.4, we, therefore, have
- (d)
-
- () This was already proven in Exercise 3.1.3.
- () Let be arbitrary. Then, is contained in and is contained in But this is equivalent to the fact that is contained in and is contained in But the last statement is equivalent to by Definition 3.1.23. Since our choice of was arbitrary,
- (e)
-
- () This was already proven in Exercise 3.1.3.
-
() By Exercise 3.1.4, it suffices to show that and vice versa.
-
-
Let be arbitrary. By Definition 3.1.23, we have and . By Definition 3.1.23 again, means that and both hold. Since and all hold, is true, and therefore, since is true as well, holds, as desired.
-
-
Let be arbitrary. By Definition 3.1.23, we have and . By Definition 3.1.23 again, means that both and hold. Since and are all true, is true, and therefore, since is true, is also true, as desired.
-
- (f)
-
-
By Exercise 3.1.4 it suffices to show that
and vice versa.
-
Let be arbitrary. By Definition 3.1.23, we have and By Axiom 3.4, means that or We now look at these cases.
-
-
Since we have . Therefore, by Axiom 3.4, we have
-
-
Since we have . Therefore, by Axiom 3.4, we have
Since our choice of was arbitrary, we have
-
-
Let be arbitrary. By Axiom 3.4, we now have or We now look at both of these cases.
-
-
In this case, we have and by Definition 3.1.23. Since we have by Axiom 3.4. Since as well, by the definition of intersection we have Therefore, since is contained also in .
-
-
In this case, we have and Since we have by Axiom 3.4, Since by Definition 3.1.23, we have
-
Since our choice of was arbitrary, and both hold.
-
- By Exercise 3.1.4 it suffices to show that
and vice versa.
-
( Let be arbitrary. By Axiom 3.4, we have or We now look at these cases.
-
-
Since , we have and Hence, we have by Definition 3.1.23.
-
-
Since we have and by Definition 3.1.23. Since , we have by Axiom 3.4. Similarly, since Since and , we have
-
-
Let be arbitrary. By Definition 3.1.23, we have and We now look at these cases. By Axiom 3.4, we have or and or For this statement to be true, at least one of the conditions , of the first part and at least one of the conditions , of the second part must be true. We end up with four cases: and ; and and and
-
and
-
and is the same as ; since by Axiom 3.4 we have
-
and
-
Since we have
-
and
-
Since we have
-
and
-
Since and we have Therefore,
-
-
- (g)
-
- (
-
By Exercise 3.1.4, it suffices to show that
and vice versa.
- () Let be arbitrary. By Axiom 3.4, or . In the first case since by the theorem assumption. In the latter case, and in particular implies that . Thus, in both cases, and we are done.
- () Let be arbitrary. Since by theorem assumption means that or . We now look at these cases. In the first case, we have by Axiom 3.4. In the latter case, combined with implies that by Definition 3.1.27. Therefore, holds by Axiom 3.4.
- (
- () Let be arbitrary. We have and By definition of set difference is equivalent to and Therefore, is equivalent to and and But and cannot hold at once, therefore, we have
- (h)
- (De Morgan’s laws)
- (
-
By Exercise 3.1.4 it suffices to show that
and vice versa.
- () Let be arbitrary. Therefore, we have and means that and 1 . Thus, means that and and . Therefore, , hold by Definition 3.1.27, and therefore, by Definition 3.1.23.
- () Let in be arbitrary. We have and By the definition of set difference we have and and Thus, we have (see the footnote). Since is also contained in we have
- (
- ()
By Exercise 3.1.4 it suffices to show that
and vice versa.
-
() Let be arbitrary. Then, by the definition of set difference, we have and means that or 2 . We now look at these cases.
-
-
Since and we have Therefore, is also true.
-
-
Since and we have Therefore, is also true.
-
-
() Let be arbitrary. Then, or We now look at these cases.
-
-
We have and by definition of set difference. Since . Since we can conclude that
-
-
We have and by definition of set difference. Since . Since we can conclude that
-
-