Homepage › Solution manuals › Terence Tao › Analysis I › Exercise 3.2.1
Exercise 3.2.1
Show that the universal specification axiom, Axiom 3.8, if assumed to be true, would imply Axioms 3.2, 3.3, 3.4, 3.5, and 3.6. (If we assume that all natural numbers are objects, we also obtain Axiom 3.7.) Thus, this axiom, if permitted, would simplify the foundations of set theory tremendously (and can be viewed as one basis for an intuitive model of set theory known as “naive set theory”). Unfortunately, as we have seen, Axiom 3.8 is “too good to be true”!
Answers
Proof.
- 1.
- (Axiom 3.8
Axiom 3.2) Let
be a property of
such that ,
and consider the set specified by this property, i.e.,
Then the above set is identical with the empty set from Axiom 3.2 since no object can satisfy .
- 2.
- (Axiom 3.8
Axiom 3.3) Let
be a property of
such that ,
and consider the set specified by this property, i.e.,
Then the above set is identical with the singleton set from Axiom 3.3 since the only object contained in this set is .
- 3.
- (Axiom 3.8
Axiom 3.4) Let
be a property of
such that
or ,
and consider the set specified by this property, i.e.,
Then the above set is identical with the pairwise union set from Axiom 3.4.
- 4.
- (Axiom 3.8
Axiom 3.5) Let
be a property of
such that
and
is true, and consider the set specified by this property, i.e.,
Then the above set is identical with the specification set from Axiom 3.5.
- 5.
- (Axiom 3.8
Axiom 3.6) Let
be a property of
such that
is true for some
is true, and consider the set specified by this property, i.e.,
Then the above set is identical with the replacement set from Axiom 3.6.