Homepage › Solution manuals › Terence Tao › Analysis I › Exercise 3.3.4 (Cancellation laws for composition)
Exercise 3.3.4 (Cancellation laws for composition)
In this section we give some cancellation laws for composition. Let , , , and . Show that if and is injective, then . Is the same statement true if is not injective? Show that if and is surjective, then . Is the same statement true if is not surjective?
Answers
For the first claim, suppose .
Then there exists some
such that . Since
is injective, this implies
that which contradicts
the assumption that .
If
is not injective, this statement is not true. As a counter example, let
and consider
such that
for all
(assuming
). This
is not injective
and clearly
for any and
considered,
including where .
For the second claim, suppose . This implies that there exists a such that . Since is surjective, there exists such that . So we have which contradicts the assumption that . If is not surjective this statement is not true. As a counter example, consider a constant function, i.e. let , (again assuming ) for all . Then, is not surjective. Then, implies and are equal at , i.e. , but can differ at any other point , and so does not imply that .