Homepage Solution manuals Terence Tao Analysis I Exercise 3.3.4 (Cancellation laws for composition)

Exercise 3.3.4 (Cancellation laws for composition)

In this section we give some cancellation laws for composition. Let f : X Y , f~: X Y , g: Y Z, and g~: Y Z. Show that if g f = g f~ and g is injective, then f = f~. Is the same statement true if g is not injective? Show that if g f = g~ f and f is surjective, then g = g~. Is the same statement true if f is not surjective?

Answers

For the first claim, suppose ff~. Then there exists some x X such that f(x)f~(x). Since g is injective, this implies that (g f)(x)(g f~)(x) which contradicts the assumption that g f = g f~. If g is not injective, this statement is not true. As a counter example, let c Z and consider g such that g(y) = c for all y Y (assuming Y {y}). This g is not injective and clearly g f = g f~ for any f and f~ considered, including where ff~.

For the second claim, suppose gg~. This implies that there exists a y Y such that g(y)g~(y). Since f is surjective, there exists x X such that f(x) = y. So we have (g f)(x)(g~ f)(x) which contradicts the assumption that g f = g~ f. If f is not surjective this statement is not true. As a counter example, consider f a constant function, i.e. let f(x) = a, a Y (again assuming Y {a}) for all x X. Then, f is not surjective. Then, g f = g~ f implies g and g~ are equal at a, i.e. g(a) = g~(a), but can differ at any other point a Y , aa and so does not imply that g = g~.

User profile picture
2022-02-21 12:11
Comments