Homepage Solution manuals Terence Tao Analysis I Exercise 3.6.4 (Cardinal arithmetic)

Exercise 3.6.4 (Cardinal arithmetic)

Prove Proposition 3.6.14.

Proposition 3.6.14

(a)
Let X be a finite set, and let x be an object which is not an element of X. Then X {x} is finite and #(X {x}) = #(X) + 1.
(b)
Let X and Y be finite sets. Then X Y is finite and #(X Y ) #(X) + #(Y ). If in addition X and Y are disjoint (i.e., X Y = ), then #(X Y ) = #(X) + #(Y ).
(c)
Let X be a finite set, and let Y be a subset of X. Then Y is finite, and #(Y ) #(X). If in addition Y X (i.e., Y is a proper subset of X), then we have #(Y ) < #(X).
(d)
If X is a finite set, and f : X Y is a function, then f(X) is a finite set with #(f(X)) #(X). If in addition f is one-to-one, then #(f(X)) = #(X).
(e)
Let X and Y be finite sets. Then Cartesian product X × Y is finite and #(X × Y ) = #(X) × #(Y ).
(f)
Let X and Y be finite sets. Then the set Y X (defined in Axiom 3.10) is finite and # (Y X) = #(Y )#(X).

Answers

(e) There are at least two ways to do this problem; a direct induction or the more elegant use of the Euclidean algorithm. We present the latter. We wish to exhibit a bijection between the numbers {0,,nm 1}. Given any number q nm 1, the Euclidean algorithm gives q = pm + r with 0 r m and this representation is unique. If X has cardinality n and Y has m, given by the bijections f and g respectively, then we will use these to create a bijection h onto X × Y . Note that we take f(g) to have domain {0,,n 1(m 1)}.

So, let q {0,,nm 1},q = pm + r. Define h(q) to be (f(p),g(r). Uniqueness of the representation of q gives that this is well defined. h is one to one since h(q) = h (q) implies f(p) = f (p) and g(r) = g (r). As f and g are one to one, p = p and r = r, so q = q. Finally, given (x,y) X × Y , since f and g are onto there exist t {0,,n 1} and z {0,,m 1} with f(t) = x and g(z) = y. So h(tm + z) = (x,y).

User profile picture
2021-12-19 20:22
Comments