Homepage › Solution manuals › Terence Tao › Analysis I › Exercise 3.6.9 (Cardinality of a union of two sets)
Exercise 3.6.9 (Cardinality of a union of two sets)
Let and be finite sets. Show that and are also finite sets, and that .
Answers
My proof below unfortunately cheats in that I’m going to show instead. This is essentially the same as what we need to show, but we are utilizing the notion of subtraction which we have not defined at this point in the text (except technically in Lemma 3.6.9). If anyone else has an alternative proof which is "more correct" than mine, please post it. I suspect that proof would need to create a bijection in some way, but I found that difficult to conceive.
Proof.
We first show that and are finite. With and finite, we automatically know is finite by part (b) of Proposition 3.6.14. As for , we know, by Exercise 3.1.7, that ; since is finite, we have, by part (c) of Proposition 3.6.14, that is finite.
We now show . By Exercise 3.1.10, we have that
where , , and are disjoint. I first want to show that . To show this, we quickly prove the following claim:
Claim. , , and are mutually disjoint, that is,
- (A
- (A
- (B
Proof of Claim, bullet 1. Let . Then and . This implies and . But this would mean and , which is impossible. Hence, , implying .
Proof of Claim, bullet 2. Let . Then and . This implies and . But this implies , which is impossible. Hence, , implying .
Proof of Claim, bullet 3. Same as above, just interchange the roles of and .
Thus, we have shown that , , and are mutually disjoint.
Now, observe the following:
implies
By our Claim above, we must have that the set and are disjoint (easy to show). Thus, by part (b) of Proposition 3.6.14, we have that
Furthermore, by our Claim and by (b) of Proposition 3.6.14, we have that
Putting this altogether, we have:
But we have that and (these are easy to show). Then and . By repeated use of Lemma 3.6.9, we get that and . Thus we get:
and we are done.
Comments
By part (b) of Proposition 3.6.14, is finite.
Next, ; since is finite, is finite by part (c) of Proposition 3.6.14.
Let , . To prove the final result, we fix and proceed by induction on .
For the base case, let . Then , which means and , so that we have
which proves the base case.
Now assume the result holds for some . We want to show that it does for . Choose , and let . Applying Lemma 3.6.1, we have , and by Proposition 3.6.14 (a), . So
and applying the inductive step, we obtain
There are two possibilities:
- 1.
-
. Then
, so that
.
We next claim that . For let . Then and , which means since . And since , . So .
Going the other way, let . Then and . Since , . So , and by extensionality, . By Lemma 3.6.9, therefore, .
Thus . Combining equalities, we obtain
- 2.
-
. Then
, and by Lemma 3.6.1,
.
We now show that . Let . Then , and since , . So .
Going the other way, let . Then and . Since , . So , or . Thus . So
We have shown that for finite sets and .