Exercise 2.2.6

Let m and n be Euclidean spaces. If f : X m and g : X n are continuous functions, show that f g : X m+n is also continuous. Is the converse true?

Answers

Proof. Since f,g are continuous, we know that for each x0 X, given 𝜖 > 0 there is δ1,δ2 such that if dX (x,x0) < δ1 then d (m,l2 ) (f(x),f (x0)) < 𝜖 and if dX (x,x0) < δ2 then d (n,l2 ) (g(x),g (x0)) < 𝜖.

Let x0 X and given 𝜖 > 0 let 𝜖 = 𝜖 2 and take δ = min {δ1,δ2} . Now if dX (x,x0) < δ we know from the continuity of f,g that d (m,l2 ) (f(x),f (x0)) < 𝜖 and d (n,l2 ) (g(x),g (x0)) < 𝜖.

Note that f(x),f (x0) are m-tuples, and that g(x),g (x0) are n-tuples. So let fi(x) denote the i-th component in the m-tuple f(x), and similarly for fi (x0) ,gi(x),gi (x0). And so we will define f g(x) = (f1(x),f2(x),,fm(x),g1(x),g2(x),,gn(x)).

So,

d (m,l2 ) (f(x),f (x0)) < 𝜖 and d ( n,l2 ) (g(x),g (x0)) < 𝜖 i=1m (fi(x) fi (x0)) 2 < 𝜖 and  i=1n (gi(x) gi (x0)) 2 < 𝜖 i=1m (f i(x) fi (x0)) 2 < (𝜖)2 and  i=1n (g i(x) gi (x0)) 2 < (𝜖)2 i=1m (f i(x) fi (x0)) 2 + i=1n (g i(x) gi (x0)) 2 < 2 (𝜖)2 i=1m (fi(x) fi (x0)) 2 + i=1n (gi(x) gi (x0)) 2 < 2𝜖 = 𝜖

Thus, d (m+n,l2 ) (f g(x),f g (x0)) < 𝜖.

Therefore f g is continuous. □

The converse is true, and the proof is basically the same, but we will give it anyway.

Proof. If f g is continuous then we know for each x0 X given 𝜖 > 0 there is δ > 0 such that if dX (x,x0) < δ, then d (2,l2 ) (f g(x),f g (x0)) < 𝜖.

Let x0 X, and given 𝜖 > 0 let 𝜖 = 𝜖 and take δ = δ. Now from the continuity of f g we have:

i=1m (fi(x) fi (x0)) 2 + i=1n (gi(x) gi (x0)) 2 < 𝜖 = 𝜖 i=1m (f i(x) fi (x0)) 2 + i=1n (g i(x) gi (x0)) 2 < 𝜖2 i=1m (f i(x) fi (x0)) 2 < 𝜖2 and  i=1n (g i(x) gi (x0)) 2 < 𝜖2

i=1m (fi(x) fi (x0)) 2 < 𝜖 and  i=1n (gi(x) gi (x0)) 2 < 𝜖

Hence, d (m,l2 ) (f(x),f (x0)) < 𝜖 and d (n,l2 ) (g(x),g (x0)) < 𝜖

Thus f,g are also continuous. □

Remark 1. Note that there are some other ways to do this exercise:

One way is to use Lemma 12.1.18 (a d), and note that convergence in d (m,l2) ,d (n,l2) implies convergence of each component, which implies convergence in d (m+n,l2) .

Remark 2. Also one could use the same approach as my proof, but note that:

dm+n,l22 (f g(x),f g (x 0)) = dm,l22 (f(x),f (x 0)) + dn,l22 (g(x),g (x 0))

User profile picture
2021-12-19 18:17
Comments