Homepage › Solution manuals › Terence Tao › Real Analysis (An Epsilon of Room, I) › Exercise 1.3.9 ($L^p$ is separable)
Exercise 1.3.9 ($L^p$ is separable)
Suppose that is -finite and is separable (i.e., countably generated). Show that is separable (i.e., has a countable dense subset) for all . Give a counterexample that shows that need not be separable.
Answers
1. Show that
is separable for
The strategy is as follows.
(i) Let be an elementary function with for . By definition, we write1.
for . Our goal is to approximate by functions in the form
(denseness) where
should be rational and
should come from a countable basis of
(countability).
For each set , we find the approximations from a countable basis of with the property that the symmetric difference remains small2
We also approximate ’s from below with :
We use this to calculate:
(ii) Let be a bounded function in with for . We discretize the domain of , e.g. with the usual “dyadic mesh”:
Then we define
and obtain
(iii) This is the direct consequence of the theorem of monotonic convergence (e.g. if the support is gradually extended)
(iv) Let , o.b.d.A. 3. From measure theory, we know that there is a sequence of increasing elementary functions that approximates from below. We have , the last one absolutely convergent by assumption. The statement then follows with the theorem of majorized convergence
2. Find an example of a non-separable Hilbert space
The space
of functions
, for which
only for countably many
, and
It is easy to see that this is a Hilbert space, the crucial argument is that the countable union of countable sets is countable.
The functions are defined by
Then the supremum norm is if . Thus
is an uncountable collection of disjoint open balls. Now let be any dense subset, then every ball in the family must contain at least one element of , and these elements must all be distinct, so must be uncountably infinite. This shows that is not separable.
1Technically speaking, the elements of are not functions, but as soon as the differences do not cause any problems except for the zero sets, we can write them like this
2For example, as follows. By construction of we can assume that ’s do not contain their boundary and are therefore countable unions of open intervals are representable. For each let be the numbers approximating from the inside (i.e. from the right and from the left) from with the difference of most . Thus we define
and obtain the summed estimate plus .
3after