Homepage Solution manuals Tom Leinster Galois Theory Exercise 3.3.5 (Quadratic reducibility)

Exercise 3.3.5 (Quadratic reducibility)

If I gave you a quadratic over , how would you decide whether it was reducible or irreducible?

Answers

Solution: By Lemma 3.3.1 (ii), if the quadratic has a root in , then it is reducible. By the same lemma (iii), if the quadratic has no root in , then it is irreducible.

User profile picture
HN
2022-11-04 03:52
Comments

Proof. By Lemma 3.3.1, a polynomial f ( x ) = a x 2 + bx + c [ x ] , where a 0 , is irreducible if and only if f has no root in .

Now f ( x ) = a [ ( x + b 2 a ) 2 Δ 4 a 2 ] , where Δ = b 2 4 ac .

If f has a root α , then Δ = ( 2 α + b ) 2 is a square in . Conversely, if Δ is a square in , Δ = δ 2 , with δ , and the roots of f are b ± δ 2 a , both in .

We have proved that

a x 2 + bx + c  is irreducible in  [ x ] Δ = b 2 4 ac  is not a square in  .

Note: Δ = u v , u , v is a square in if and only if u , v are squares in . □

User profile picture
2024-05-23 09:45
Comments