Homepage Solution manuals Tom Leinster Galois Theory Exercise 5.1.23 (Coprime relation)

Exercise 5.1.23 (Coprime relation)

Generalize Example 5.1.22. In other words, what general result does the argument of Example 5.1.22 prove, not involving the particular numbers chosen there?

Answers

Solution: Let M : K be a field extension and α1,...,αn M. If gcd(degK(α1),...,degK(αn)) = 1 (i.e., coprime), then we have that, [K(α1,...,αn) : K] = [K(α1) : K]...[K(αn) : K]

User profile picture
HN
2022-11-02 04:09
Comments

We prove the following generalization:

Proposition Let M : K be a field extension, and α , β M be algebraic over K .

Assume that [ K ( α ) : K ] = m and [ K ( β ) : K ] = n , where gcd ( n , m ) = 1 . Then [ K ( α , β ) : K ] = nm .

Proof. Write [ K ( α , β ) : K ( α ) ] = n , and [ K ( α , β ) : K ( β ) ] = m .

By the tower law (Theorem 5.1.17),

[ K ( α , β ) : K ] = [ K ( α , β ) : K ( α ) ] [ K ( α ) : K ] = [ K ( α , β ) : K ( β ) ] [ K ( β ) : K ] ,

thus m n = n m . So n m n , with gcd ( m , n ) = 1 , therefore n n . By Corollary 5.1.12, n = [ K ( α , β ) : K ( α ) ] [ K ( β ) : K ] = n , thus n = n .

This shows [ K ( α , β ) : K ] = nm .

User profile picture
2024-05-25 11:27
Comments

Note: the generalization proposed by Hassaan Naeem seems not true. To give a counterexample, take α = 2 6 , β = 2 15 , γ = 2 10 . Then [ ( α ) : ] = 6 , [ ( β ) : ] = 15 , [ ( γ ) : ] = 10 (because t 6 2 , t 15 2 , t 10 2 are irreducible by Eisenstein’s Criterium).

Moreover gcd ( 6 , 15 , 10 ) = gcd ( 2 × 3 , 3 × 5 , 2 × 5 ) = 1 .

But ( α , β , γ ) = ( 2 6 , 2 15 , 2 10 ) ( 2 30 ) , where 30 = gcm ( 6 , 15 , 10 ) , because 2 6 = ( 2 30 ) 5 , etc...

The converse is true: since 1 30 = 1 6 + 3 15 , 2 30 = ( 2 6 ) 1 ( 2 15 ) 3 ( α , β , γ ) , thus

( 2 6 , 2 15 , 2 10 ) = ( 2 30 ) .

Therefore

[ ( α , β , γ ) : ] = 30 [ ( α ) : ] [ ( β ) : ] [ ( γ ) : ) ] = 6 × 15 × 10 = 900 .

If we want to generalize, we must assume that gcd ( deg k ( α i ) , deg k ( α j ) ) = 1 if i j .

User profile picture
2024-05-25 11:57
Comments