Homepage › Solution manuals › Tom Leinster › Galois Theory › Exercise 5.1.23 (Coprime relation)
Exercise 5.1.23 (Coprime relation)
Generalize Example 5.1.22. In other words, what general result does the argument of Example 5.1.22 prove, not involving the particular numbers chosen there?
Answers
Solution: Let be a field extension and . If (i.e., coprime), then we have that,
Comments
We prove the following generalization:
Proposition Let be a field extension, and be algebraic over .
Assume that and , where . Then
Proof. Write , and .
By the tower law (Theorem 5.1.17),
thus . So , with , therefore . By Corollary 5.1.12, , thus .
This shows □
Comments
Note: the generalization proposed by Hassaan Naeem seems not true. To give a counterexample, take . Then (because are irreducible by Eisenstein’s Criterium).
Moreover .
But , where , because , etc...
The converse is true: since , , thus
Therefore
If we want to generalize, we must assume that if .